Bug 1679263 - radosgw-admin bucket limit check stuck generating high read ops with > 999 buckets per user [Consulting] [NEEDINFO]
Summary: radosgw-admin bucket limit check stuck generating high read ops with > 999 bu...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RGW
Version: 3.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: z2
: 3.2
Assignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat)
QA Contact: Tejas
John Brier
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1629656
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-02-20 18:30 UTC by Vikhyat Umrao
Modified: 2019-04-30 19:32 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-12.2.8-106.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.8-91redhat1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The _radosgw-admin_ utility no longer gets stuck and creates high read operations when creating greater than 999 buckets per user An issue with a limit check caused the `radosgw-admin` utility to never finish when creating 1,000 or more buckets per user. This problem has been fixed and `radosgw-admin` no longer gets stuck or creates high read operations.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-30 15:56:46 UTC
tchandra: needinfo? (cbodley)
jbrier: needinfo? (mbenjamin)


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2019:0911 None None None 2019-04-30 15:57:00 UTC
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 35973 None None None 2019-02-20 18:30:42 UTC

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2019-02-20 18:30:02 UTC
Description of problem:
radosgw-admin bucket limit check stuck generating high read ops with > 999 buckets per user
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/35973


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHCS 3.1 

How reproducible:
At customer site always

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2019-04-30 15:56:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0911


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.