Description of problem: In addition to a large number of changes that probably shoudln't have been introduced in F29 there is a syntax error in exim.conf with the 4.92 update: 2019-02-20 18:57:03 Exim configuration error in line 122 of /etc/exim/exim.conf: option setting expected: +acl_smtp_mail = acl_check_mail The leading + on that line is not valid.... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): exim-4.92-1.fc29.x86_64
Also was the greylist stuff supposed to get moved from the data acl to the mime acl?
This also affects Fedora 28. (It would be nice to add a %check section that (maybe in addition to running Exim's own test suite which is always a good idea) checks that the configuration file is valid by running something like "./exim -C ./src/configure.default -bV".) NB: Due to this bug, currently mail from cron & Co. gets silently discarded. To work around, edit /etc/exim/exim.conf à la: | --- /etc/exim/exim.conf~ 2019-02-11 21:35:34.000000000 +0000 | +++ /etc/exim/exim.conf 2019-03-02 00:51:16.872940421 +0000 | @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ | # manual for details. The lists above are used in the access control lists for | # checking incoming messages. The names of these ACLs are defined here: | -+acl_smtp_mail = acl_check_mail | +acl_smtp_mail = acl_check_mail | acl_smtp_rcpt = acl_check_rcpt | .ifdef _HAVE_PRDR | acl_smtp_data_prdr = acl_check_prdr
I've pushed a fix for Fedora 28 to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/pull-request/3. Please note that this does not address Tom's question in comment #1.
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #0) > Description of problem: > > In addition to a large number of changes that probably shoudln't have been > introduced in F29 there is a syntax error in exim.conf with the 4.92 update: > Sorry about it. In the past upstream had LTS versions, now it obsoleted everything older than 4.92. It's usually pain to maintain unsupported obsoleted versions, hence the rebase.
(In reply to Tim Landscheidt from comment #3) > I've pushed a fix for Fedora 28 to > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/pull-request/3. Please note that > this does not address Tom's question in comment #1. Thanks, merged.
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #1) > Also was the greylist stuff supposed to get moved from the data acl to the > mime acl? Sorry, merge error, is exim-4.92-4.fc31 OK? I am going to fix other branches as well.
exim-4.92-4.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-754bb22186
exim-4.92-4.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-adf4161f4b
exim-4.92-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-adf4161f4b
exim-4.92-4.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-754bb22186
exim-4.92-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
exim-4.92-4.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.