Bug 1679946 - [Multus][network-operator] Should be able to configure the namespace of the default net-attach-def
Summary: [Multus][network-operator] Should be able to configure the namespace of the d...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 4.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.1.0
Assignee: Casey Callendrello
QA Contact: zhaozhanqi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-02-22 10:15 UTC by Meng Bo
Modified: 2019-10-22 03:30 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-04 10:44:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2019:0758 0 None None None 2019-06-04 10:44:33 UTC

Description Meng Bo 2019-02-22 10:15:58 UTC
Description of problem:
Currently, if we define the net-attach-def in additionalNetwork during installation. It will create the cr in the "default" namespace by hardcoded. And the namespaceIsolation is enabled by default. That means the cr defined in additionalNetwork is hardly be used.

We should put the net-attach-def in the multusNamespace which introduced in https://github.com/intel/multus-cni/pull/254


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
v4.0.0-0.177.0

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Setup OCP cluster with the following networkconfig.networkoperator.openshift.io

apiVersion: networkoperator.openshift.io/v1
kind: NetworkConfig
metadata:
  name: default
spec:
  additionalNetworks:
  - name: macvlan-conf
    rawCNIConfig: '{ "type": "macvlan", "name": "macvlan-network", "master": "eth0",
      "ipam": { "type": "host-local", "subnet": "10.200.1.0/24", "routes": [{ "dst":
      "0.0.0.0/0" }], "gateway": "10.200.1.1" } }'
    type: Raw
  clusterNetworks:
  - cidr: 10.128.0.0/14
    hostSubnetLength: 9
  defaultNetwork:
    openshiftSDNConfig:
      mode: NetworkPolicy
    type: OpenShiftSDN
  serviceNetwork: 172.30.0.0/16

2. Check the net-attach-def created after the cluster setup
3.

Actual results:
The net-attach-def is created under default namespace and hardly be used. Means the additionalNetwork is kind of useless.

Expected results:
Should be able to modify the namespace value or put it under multusNamespace which introduced in https://github.com/intel/multus-cni/pull/254

Additional info:

Comment 1 Casey Callendrello 2019-02-22 12:50:22 UTC
Dan,
Can you take a look at this?

Comment 2 Tomofumi Hayashi 2019-02-22 12:58:36 UTC
Dan,

I've submit fix PR for that into upstream: https://github.com/intel/multus-cni/pull/271

Comment 3 Tomofumi Hayashi 2019-02-22 12:59:18 UTC
Casay,

Can I take it?
If you don't mind, I assign it to me.

Comment 4 Tomofumi Hayashi 2019-02-22 13:51:21 UTC
Casey and Dan,

Let me clarify the above PR.
From multus side, we have issue around clusterNetwork, https://github.com/intel/multus-cni/issues/261
Multus will choose different namesppace for clusterNetwork (it should be multusNamespace, but actually it reads from default).
Above PR is to fix this issue.

Comment 5 zenghui.shi 2019-02-25 02:10:01 UTC
(In reply to Tomofumi Hayashi from comment #4)
> Casey and Dan,
> 
> Let me clarify the above PR.
> From multus side, we have issue around clusterNetwork,
> https://github.com/intel/multus-cni/issues/261
> Multus will choose different namesppace for clusterNetwork (it should be
> multusNamespace, but actually it reads from default).
> Above PR is to fix this issue.

I think there are two folders of this problem:
1) Even multus supports 'systemNamespaces' and 'multusNamespace', it's not configurable via operator.
2) In operator, the namespace in net-attach-def custom resource template is hardcoded to 'default' namespace.

Comment 7 Ben Bennett 2019-04-02 12:58:08 UTC
@Tomofumi I see the multus-cni plugin has merged.  Do we need to do anything to bring that code in to OpenShift 4.1?

Comment 10 Meng Bo 2019-05-08 12:20:02 UTC
Tested on 4.1.0-0.nightly-2019-05-08-065958

The additional network can be created in the specified namespace.

spec:
  additionalNetworks:
  - name: sriov-conf
    namespace: openshift-sriov
    rawCNIConfig: '{ "type": "sriov", "name": "sriov-network",
      "ipam": { "type": "host-local", "subnet": "10.11.11.0/24", "routes": [{ "dst":
      "0.0.0.0/0" }], "gateway": "10.11.11.1" } }'
    type: Raw
  clusterNetwork:
  - cidr: 10.128.0.0/14
    hostPrefix: 23
  defaultNetwork:
    openshiftSDNConfig:
      mode: NetworkPolicy
    type: OpenShiftSDN
  serviceNetwork:
  - 172.30.0.0/16

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2019-06-04 10:44:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.