Bug 1683209 - [DOCS] OCS 3.11 upgrade: elaborate step regarding how full bricks are
Summary: [DOCS] OCS 3.11 upgrade: elaborate step regarding how full bricks are
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: doc-Container_Native_Storage_with_OpenShift
Version: ocs-3.11
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: OCS 3.11.z Async
Assignee: Disha Walvekar
QA Contact: Aditya Ramteke
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1845059
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-02-26 13:10 UTC by daniel
Modified: 2021-01-05 06:50 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-01-05 06:50:59 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description daniel 2019-02-26 13:10:28 UTC
Document URL: 
-- app storage part 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/3.11/html/deployment_guide/chap-documentation-red_hat_gluster_storage_container_native_with_openshift_platform-upgrade#chap-Documentation-Red_Hat_Gluster_Storage_Container_Native_with_OpenShift_Platform-Upgrade-Gluster_pods

-- registry-storage
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/3.11/html/deployment_guide/chap-upgrade-glusterfs-registry-namespace#chap-registry-Documentation-Red_Hat_Gluster_Storage_Container_Native_with_OpenShift_Platform-Upgrade-Gluster_pods

Section Number and Name: 
app-storage:
6.1.3. Upgrading the Red Hat Gluster Storage Pods
   11. Execute the following commmand and ensure that the bricks are not more than 90% full: 
                 # df -kh | grep -v ^Filesystem | awk '{if($5>"90%") print $0}'

registry-storage:
6.2.3. Upgrading the Red Hat Gluster Storage Registry Pods
   10.  Execute the following commmand and ensure that the bricks are not more than 90% full: 
                 # df -kh | grep -v ^Filesystem | awk '{if($5>"90%") print $0}'

Describe the issue: 
I think we should explain better why this step is needed, what could happen if ignored and most important what to do if one is beyond the limit

Suggestions for improvement: 
Elaborate the reason for this check as well and consequences if ignored _and_ what to do if bricks are fuller than the 90%

Additional information:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.