Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 product line. The current stable release is 4.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 168659

Summary: CVE-2005-3044 lost fput and sockfd_put could lead to DoS
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Mark J. Cox <mjc>
Component: kernelAssignee: Alexander Viro <aviro>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: jbaron, khorenko, security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: reported=20050914,source=vendorsec,public=20050909,impact=moderate
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0101 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-17 08:33:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 168429    

Comment 1 Alexander Viro 2005-11-16 17:41:28 UTC
patch is obviously correct and should be applied even if there had been
no security implications.

Comment 9 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-01-17 08:33:01 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0101.html


Comment 10 Vasily Averin 2007-02-09 09:29:42 UTC
SWsoft Virtuozzo/OpenVZ Linux kernel team would like to note that CVE-2005-3044
 is still not fully fixed in RHEL4 kernel 2.6.9-42.0.8
Please see the for details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227978


Comment 11 Mark J. Cox 2008-05-19 07:28:56 UTC
for historical interest #227978 is private but the public version of that bug is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243252