Hide Forgot
If csi-operator is not being build in OSBS, it should be removed from origin and promotion. Also, csi-external-provisioner is similarly old and needs to be made consistent (built or disabled in origin). Finally, the following images exist only in OCP - if they are not part of 4.1, they should be removed from OCP. If they are part of 4.1, they must have origin gating jobs. cephfs-provisioner, cluster-nfd-operator, csi-provisioner, efs-provisioner, manila-provisioner, snapshot-controller, snapshot-provisioner
Snapshots were added to CI: https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/3142
> If csi-operator is not being build in OSBS, it should be removed from origin and promotion Ack. Removing its 'images' job: https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/3146. Is anything else necessary? > Also, csi-external-provisioner is similarly old and needs to be made consistent (built or disabled in origin). That's odd, because there is "csi-provisioner" built and shipped. They are the same thing. Looks like a typo somewhere. > cluster-nfd-operator "Node Feature Discovery Operator". This one is not ours. > Finally, the following images exist only in OCP - if they are not part of 4.1, they should be removed from OCP. If they are part of 4.1, they must have origin gating jobs. > cephfs-provisioner, csi-provisioner, efs-provisioner, manila-provisioner, snapshot-controller, snapshot-provisioner Will check what we want with these images.
The manila-provisioner image should be dropped from 4.1: there is the ose-manila-provisioner replacing it there and being built from different upstream.
> Will check what we want with these images. Filling https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sJrEODvsfc-xH0fLc1XeBlcGr5S7VEQPogNxr9q4Jcs/edit - We want csi-* (except csi-operator) built for 4.2. - We want efs-provisioner, manila-provisioner and cephfs-provisioner removed from builds.
Note to manila: we want to keep building the new "ose-manila-provisioner" image in OSBS. And I added it to the OpenShit CI just recently too. So that one is hopefully OK too.
Filled https://jira.coreos.com/browse/ART-518 to remove OCP images. IMO that's all for this BZ.
For completeness -- the "new" Manila is included in the Origin CI now too: https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/3147
The origin csi-operator is up to date: $ curl -X GET https://quay.io/api/v1/repository/openshift/origin-csi-operator|json_reformat % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 1102 100 1102 0 0 936 0 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:-- 936 { "trust_enabled": false, "description": null, "tags": { "v4.0.0": { "image_id": "bb20accfc1485bfed3a24b3a054144bc5adf34742ec49ca325193d7108fcb288", "last_modified": "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:00:49 -0000", "name": "v4.0.0", "manifest_digest": "sha256:237c983a8fc57ac23332ff65f3728f1cb9e0487bd259a0177d0f2f934285b86b", "size": 93093324 }, "v4.0": { "image_id": "bb20accfc1485bfed3a24b3a054144bc5adf34742ec49ca325193d7108fcb288", "last_modified": "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:00:48 -0000", "name": "v4.0", "manifest_digest": "sha256:237c983a8fc57ac23332ff65f3728f1cb9e0487bd259a0177d0f2f934285b86b", "size": 93093324 }, "latest": { "image_id": "bb20accfc1485bfed3a24b3a054144bc5adf34742ec49ca325193d7108fcb288", "last_modified": "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:00:48 -0000", "name": "latest", "manifest_digest": "sha256:237c983a8fc57ac23332ff65f3728f1cb9e0487bd259a0177d0f2f934285b86b", "size": 93093324 } }, "tag_expiration_s": 1209600, "is_public": true, "is_starred": false, "kind": "image", "name": "origin-csi-operator", "namespace": "openshift", "is_organization": true, "can_write": false, "status_token": "", "can_admin": false } And for csi-operator there is no latest and 4.1 tag which means it has been removed from building job.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758