Hide Forgot
Description of problem: https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_installer/1519/pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws/4868#openshift-tests-k8sio-kubelet-when-scheduling-a-busybox-pod-with-hostaliases-should-write-entries-to-etchosts-nodeconformance-conformance-suiteopenshiftconformanceparallelminimal-suitek8s Looks to be appearing as a failure in every test run right now. Clayton suggests disabling the test for now.
Ravi, PTAL since this intersects with the /etc/hosts support in dns-operator.
Here's an example /etc/hosts from a node: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4 ::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6 172.30.23.104 image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc.cluster.local # openshift-generated-node-resolver The entry on line 3 is maintained by the `dns-node-resolver` container in `openshift-dns/dns-default` pods on nodes.
This test has been re-enabled for 22 days: https://github.com/openshift/origin/commit/fb601b2c65e5a32b5144186392bf31472ca14efd And the only 2 occurrences of the test failing over the last couple of days over 548 failures are due to test panics which appear to be collateral from a wider problem: https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/22442/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws/7860 https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/22661/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws/7903 I'm going to call this flake solved for now. If new evidence appears, we can open a new bug.
I'm going to move this to verified, please reopen if it still exists in latest CI test.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758