Bug 169715 – Install dependency for nscd failed after bulding glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1 from source

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 169715 - Install dependency for nscd failed after bulding glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1 from source

Summary:	Install dependency for nscd failed after bulding glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1 from source

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora Legacy
Classification:	Retired
Component:	glibc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	fc2
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Fedora Legacy Bugs
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-10-01 18:54 EDT by Bob Hockney
Modified:	2016-11-24 10:17 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-02 00:14:00 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Bob Hockney 2005-10-01 18:54:40 EDT

Description of problem:

Trying to build from source and install glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1 from source for i686
on FC2.  Build is successful and RPMs are written, however when trying to
install the RPMs I keep getting this messages:

error: Failed dependencies:
        nscd < 2.3.3-52 conflicts with glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1

I get this even though I am updating the nscd built with 2.3.5-0.fc3.1 at the
same time and also if I update nscd separately first.  I also get this messages
after forcing the update:

# rpm -q nscd
nscd-2.3.5-0.fc3.1

# rpm -V nscd
Unsatisfied dependencies for glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1: nscd < 2.3.3-52

Not sure if I am doing something wrong, but I would expect that the RPMS built
together should install together.

Comment 1 Pekka Savola 2005-10-02 00:14:00 EDT

Your RPM database might be bad, you could maybe try rebuilding it.

In any case, Fedora Legacy doesn't have resources to support this kind of
setups, so I'm closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.