Bug 1698716 - Regression job did not vote for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22366/
Summary: Regression job did not vote for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: project-infrastructure
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: bugs@gluster.org
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-04-11 05:14 UTC by Nithya Balachandran
Modified: 2019-04-25 09:45 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-25 09:45:09 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nithya Balachandran 2019-04-11 05:14:27 UTC 
Description of problem:

A full regression run has passed on https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22366/  but the Centos regression vote has not been updated.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Atin Mukherjee 2019-04-11 08:55:44 UTC 
I don't think full regression votes back into the gerrit. However even a normal regression run isn't doing either and a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698694 is filed for the same.
Comment 2 M. Scherer 2019-04-11 13:42:54 UTC 
Yep, they don't (afaik).
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.