Bug 169919 – Review Request: m17n-db - multilingualization datafiles

Bug 169919 - (m17n-db-review) Review Request: m17n-db - multilingualization datafiles

Summary:	Review Request: m17n-db - multilingualization datafiles

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	m17n-db-review

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Warren Togami
QA Contact:	David Lawrence
Docs Contact:

URL:	http://www.m17n.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	FE-ACCEPT m17n-lib-review
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-10-05 01:33 EDT by Jens Petersen
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-11-11 19:49:37 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jens Petersen 2005-10-05 01:33:08 EDT

Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db-1.2.0-1.src.rpm 
Description:
m17n-db contains multilingualization (m17n) datafiles for m17n-lib
which describe input maps, encoding maps, and OpenType font data
for many languages.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2005-11-09 02:33:20 EST

Split some datafiles not needed for input out of the main package
and updated spec and srpm files:

new SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db-1.2.0-0.2.src.rpm

Comment 2 Warren Togami 2005-11-09 22:03:24 EST

Does every sub-package need to own %{_datadir}/m17n?
Do the sub-packages need the main package that contains /usr/bin/m17n-db and
other stuff?

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2005-11-10 03:06:33 EST

> Does every sub-package need to own %{_datadir}/m17n?

Good question.  Since they all require m17n-db, is it superfluous?

> Do the sub-packages need the main package that contains /usr/bin/m17n-db and
> other stuff?

I think m17n-db is just needed to build m17n-lib.  (I suppose it could go in
m17n-db-devel, but that seems to be overdoing it.)

scim-m17n needs the datafiles in m17n-db to work, so that is the reason
they're there.  The others are now in m17n-db-datafiles

Comment 4 Warren Togami 2005-11-10 11:19:09 EST

File permissions are all good, I suppose this is good enough for now.  APPROVED

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2005-11-11 04:50:36 EST

Thanks.  Imported into cvs and build requested.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.