Hide Forgot
After the cluster is up for just a short time the number of revisions of the kube-scheduler is very high. After 20m, we are near revision 100.
Due to unstable map ordering https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/blob/master/pkg/operator/target_config_reconciler_v311_00.go#L151 PR soon.
Bug went in on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/72 about 21 hours ago
PR - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/99
(In reply to Seth Jennings from comment #2) > Bug went in on > https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/72 about > 21 hours ago Hi Seth, after 28h, there's no a lot of revisions of cm as below, is this good enough for pushing the bug to VERIFIED? [nathan@dhcp-140-199 0422]$ oc get cm NAME DATA AGE config 1 28h config-1 1 28h config-2 1 28h config-3 1 28h kube-scheduler-pod 3 28h kube-scheduler-pod-1 3 28h kube-scheduler-pod-2 3 28h kube-scheduler-pod-3 3 28h revision-status-1 2 28h revision-status-2 2 28h revision-status-3 2 28h scheduler-kubeconfig 1 28h scheduler-kubeconfig-1 1 28h scheduler-kubeconfig-2 1 28h scheduler-kubeconfig-3 1 28h serviceaccount-ca 1 28h serviceaccount-ca-1 1 28h serviceaccount-ca-2 1 28h serviceaccount-ca-3 1 28h [nathan@dhcp-140-199 0422]$ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.1.0-0.nightly-2019-04-20-175514 True False 22h Cluster version is 4.1.0-0.nightly-2019-04-20-175514
Yes, that is the expected result.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758