Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1700765

Summary: DHCP Conflict error due to Host entries not cleaned
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Vatsal Parekh <vparekh>
Component: NetworkingAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Roman Plevka <rplevka>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.6.0CC: mshira, pkliczew
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-06-08 13:13:56 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vatsal Parekh 2019-04-17 10:57:44 UTC
Description of problem:
On the latest nightly foreman, I saw that I tried to create hosts with KubeVirt compute resource, there were some issues with the provisioning parameters and it didn't actually create it, but when going to create those hosts again with the same mac, I was getting this DHCP conflict error, debugging further found out that entries were not cleared dhcpd.leases.
Once I cleared those entries manually from dhcpd.leases and restarted dhcpd, the host creation worked again.

production.log
```
2019-04-17T06:18:19 [W|app|339e4a72] Create DHCP Settings for sally-woodcock.example.com task failed with the following error: ERF12-6899 [ProxyAPI::ProxyException]: Unable to set DHCP entry ([RestClient::Conflict]: 409 Conflict) for proxy https://host-8-249-193.host.centralci.eng.rdu2.redhat.com:8443/dhcp
ProxyAPI::ProxyException: ERF12-6899 [ProxyAPI::ProxyException]: Unable to set DHCP entry ([RestClient::Conflict]: 409 Conflict) for proxy https://host-8-249-193.host.centralci.eng.rdu2.redhat.com:8443/dhcp
```

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nightly of foreman, master of foreman-kubevirt

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
Gives the conflict error for dhcp as the entries were not automatically cleaned by foreman for the hosts that were deleted or creation had failed

Expected results:


Additional info:
Not able to fully reproduce it right now, but saw this more then once, so filed this

Comment 3 Piotr Kliczewski 2019-04-17 13:34:18 UTC
This bug seems to be either foreman or environment issue. Shira please take a look

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2020-05-01 14:22:40 UTC
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2020-06-08 13:13:56 UTC
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.