Spec URL: http://blackbox.dinechin.org/fedora/recorder.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbox.dinechin.org/fedora/recorder-1.0.7-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A lock-free, real-time flight recorder for C or C++ programs Fedora Account System Username: ddd Copr builds here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ddd/recorder/builds/ This is only my second Fedora package, so please review carefully ;-)
- Drop "A " from Summary. - Please end Description sentences with a period. - You have mixed tabs and spaces. - The license seems to be GPL, not LGPL. Please clarify this with upstream, as the COPYING file contains the LGPL, but all license headers state GPL. - devel and scope packages should depend on %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} (though you won't need the latter once some Changes go through). - You don't need Requires:qt5-qtcharts as the executable is linked with the library and will have automatic dependency on it. - The makefile is not verbose, so I cannot verify if the required flags are being used from the log. - Don't use %{__install} macros (also the cd is kind of unneeded). - buildroot is always defined; don't need to %{?...} - Pass -p to install to preserve timestamps. - There's a segfault in %check, but it doesn't fail. I don't know if that's on purpose or it's broken. - ldconfig post(un) scriptlets are no longer necessary. - Use *.1.* (etc.) for man pages instead of hardcoding a compression extension. - Add soversion to library path to be certain of any ABI breaks before building (%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.1, etc.) Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License (v3)". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in 1703477-recorder/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [?]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in recorder-devel , recorder-scope , recorder-debuginfo , recorder- debugsource [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: recorder-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-devel-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-scope-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-debugsource-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-1.0.7-1.fc31.src.rpm recorder.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, prints, print f recorder-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on recorder/recorder-libs/librecorder recorder-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US librecorder -> lib recorder, lib-recorder, recorder recorder-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/recorder_dump.3.gz 177: warning: macro `TR' not defined recorder-scope.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/recorder_scope.1.gz 71: warning: macro `TR' not defined recorder.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, prints, print f recorder.src:9: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 1) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: recorder-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm recorder-scope-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- recorder-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> recorder-scope.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> recorder-scope.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/recorder_scope.1.gz 71: warning: macro `TR' not defined recorder-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on recorder/recorder-libs/librecorder recorder-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US librecorder -> lib recorder, lib-recorder, recorder recorder-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> recorder-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/recorder_dump.3.gz 177: warning: macro `TR' not defined recorder-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> recorder.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, prints, print f recorder.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> recorder.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/librecorder.so.1.0.7 /lib64/libm.so.6 recorder-scope-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. Requires -------- recorder (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) recorder-scope (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libGL.so.1()(64bit) libQt5Charts.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Charts.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.12)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librecorder.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) qt5-qtcharts rtld(GNU_HASH) recorder-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): recorder-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config librecorder.so.1()(64bit) recorder-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- recorder: librecorder.so.1()(64bit) recorder recorder(x86-64) recorder-scope: recorder-scope recorder-scope(x86-64) recorder-debugsource: recorder-debugsource recorder-debugsource(x86-64) recorder-devel: pkgconfig(recorder) recorder-devel recorder-devel(x86-64) recorder-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) recorder-debuginfo recorder-debuginfo(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/c3d/recorder/archive/v1.0.7/recorder-1.0.7.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 653634a3378654af6e2ab168492f4bb033c3a25a30148d02d98bbd3b8e2a2b50 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 653634a3378654af6e2ab168492f4bb033c3a25a30148d02d98bbd3b8e2a2b50 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1703477 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #1) > - Drop "A " from Summary. Done > - Please end Description sentences with a period. Done > - You have mixed tabs and spaces. Fixed > - The license seems to be GPL, not LGPL. Please clarify this with > upstream, as the COPYING file contains the LGPL, but all license > headers state GPL. An error when I applied my "header renormalization tool" in e7df1041176eda88aea6102d1c4ecd9f144321a6. Fixed. There are really two licences: - LGPLv2+ for the library - GPLv3+ for the scope application The license change was necessary for another project that uses the recorder library. > - devel and scope packages should depend on %{name}%{?_isa} = > %{version}-%{release} (though you won't need the latter once some > Changes go through). Ah? Ok. > - You don't need Requires:qt5-qtcharts as the executable is linked > with the library and will have automatic dependency on it. OK. Is it harmful? I see it as useful documentation. Left it for now. > - The makefile is not verbose, so I cannot verify if the required flags are > being used from the log. Made build verbose so that you can check. (For information, a verbose build log is produced by the make-it-quick build system under .logs/make.log) This comment caught my attention, and I made additional modifications to make sure the "hardeing" CFLAGS were correctly captured, basically adding a "fake" %configure step that is only used to capture these flags. > - Don't use %{__install} macros (also the cd is kind of unneeded). Done. Would you be kind enough to share the rationale? (I'm sort of new to Fedora packaging) > - buildroot is always defined; don't need to %{?...} Changed. > - Pass -p to install to preserve timestamps. Done in a first pass. In a second pass, I decided to use the %make_install feature for qmake-qt5, so I removed the explicit install. > - There's a segfault in %check, but it doesn't fail. I don't know if that's on purpose or it's broken. It's on purpose. The recorder library has a function to automatically dump what has been recorded in case of crash. That's what this test checks by provoking a sefault. > - ldconfig post(un) scriptlets are no longer necessary. Removed. Do you think this is also true on other distros (trying to make sure my .spec is reasonably reusable). > - Use *.1.* (etc.) for man pages instead of hardcoding a compression extension. Done. > - Add soversion to library path to be certain of any ABI breaks > before building (%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.1, etc.) Done. I also changed the version number of the package to match. > > > Package Review > ============== > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > ======= > > > ===== MUST items ===== > > C/C++: > [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. > [x]: Package contains no static executables. > [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. > [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) > [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. > [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > > Generic: > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or > generated", "GNU General Public License (v3)". 23 files have unknown > license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > 1703477-recorder/licensecheck.txt > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. Of note: I may be mistaken, but my experiments tend to demonstrate that the interesting flags (hardening) are only setup if you run %configure. As written above, %configure step added with "fake" configure script for that purpose. Let me know if there is a better way. > [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. > [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. > [?]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. The recorder_scope has a GUI, but I believe it is not a GUI application in the sense of the above test, since it requires command-line options for any operation (in other words, you can't launch it by double-clicking an icon). > [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package > [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. > [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory > names). > [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. > [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Fixed. > [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. > [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. > [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. > [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. > [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files. > [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines > [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least > one supported primary architecture. > [x]: Package installs properly. > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). > [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package is included in %license. > [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the > beginning of %install. > [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. > [x]: Dist tag is present. > [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. > [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't > work. > [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. > [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. > [x]: Package is not relocatable. > [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. > [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec. > [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. > [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > recorder-devel , recorder-scope , recorder-debuginfo , recorder- > debugsource > [?]: Package functions as described. > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > [!]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. > [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures. > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. > [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed > files. > [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > [x]: Buildroot is not present > [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. > [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag > [x]: SourceX is a working URL. > [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). > Note: No rpmlint messages. > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). > [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package > is arched. > [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > > > Rpmlint > ------- > Checking: recorder-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-devel-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-scope-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-debugsource-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-1.0.7-1.fc31.src.rpm > recorder.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder Intentional, part of the phrase "flight recorder" > recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, > prints, print f Intentional, refers to the C printf function > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on recorder/recorder-libs/librecorder Fixed > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US librecorder > -> lib recorder, lib-recorder, recorder Reworded > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning > /usr/share/man/man3/recorder_dump.3.gz 177: warning: macro `TR' not defined > recorder-scope.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning Fixed > /usr/share/man/man1/recorder_scope.1.gz 71: warning: macro `TR' not defined > recorder.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder > recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, > prints, print f > recorder.src:9: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 1) > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. > > > > > Rpmlint (debuginfo) > ------------------- > Checking: recorder-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > recorder-scope-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > > > > > Rpmlint (installed packages) > ---------------------------- > recorder-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service > not known> > recorder-scope.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder > <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> > recorder-scope.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning > /usr/share/man/man1/recorder_scope.1.gz 71: warning: macro `TR' not defined Fixed. > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on recorder/recorder-libs/librecorder > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US librecorder > -> lib recorder, lib-recorder, recorder > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder > <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> > recorder-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning > /usr/share/man/man3/recorder_dump.3.gz 177: warning: macro `TR' not defined > recorder-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service > not known> > recorder.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C recorder > recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US printf -> print, > prints, print f > recorder.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/c3d/recorder > <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> > recorder.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/librecorder.so.1.0.7 /lib64/libm.so.6 > recorder-scope-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://github.com/c3d/recorder <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service > not known> > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. > > > > Requires > -------- > recorder (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > /sbin/ldconfig > libc.so.6()(64bit) > libm.so.6()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > recorder-scope (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > libGL.so.1()(64bit) > libQt5Charts.so.5()(64bit) > libQt5Charts.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) > libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) > libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) > libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.12)(64bit) > libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) > libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) > libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) > libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) > libc.so.6()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) > libm.so.6()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > librecorder.so.1()(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) > qt5-qtcharts > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > recorder-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > recorder-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > /usr/bin/pkg-config > librecorder.so.1()(64bit) > > recorder-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > > > Provides > -------- > recorder: > librecorder.so.1()(64bit) > recorder > recorder(x86-64) > > recorder-scope: > recorder-scope > recorder-scope(x86-64) > > recorder-debugsource: > recorder-debugsource > recorder-debugsource(x86-64) > > recorder-devel: > pkgconfig(recorder) > recorder-devel > recorder-devel(x86-64) > > recorder-debuginfo: > debuginfo(build-id) > recorder-debuginfo > recorder-debuginfo(x86-64) > > > > Source checksums > ---------------- > https://github.com/c3d/recorder/archive/v1.0.7/recorder-1.0.7.tar.gz : > CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : > 653634a3378654af6e2ab168492f4bb033c3a25a30148d02d98bbd3b8e2a2b50 > CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : > 653634a3378654af6e2ab168492f4bb033c3a25a30148d02d98bbd3b8e2a2b50 > > > Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 > Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1703477 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 > Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 > Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ > Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, > R, PHP > Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Bumped library number. http://blackbox.dinechin.org/fedora/recorder.spec http://blackbox.dinechin.org/fedora/recorder-1.0.8-1.fc29.src.rpm
(In reply to Christophe de Dinechin from comment #2) > (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #1) > > - You don't need Requires:qt5-qtcharts as the executable is linked > > with the library and will have automatic dependency on it. > > OK. Is it harmful? I see it as useful documentation. Left it for now. > As you can see from the Requires list, you'll have libQt5Charts.so.5()(64bit) and libQt5Charts.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) already, which contain more information than the package name. Also, it seems that you removed it anyway? > > - The makefile is not verbose, so I cannot verify if the required flags are > > being used from the log. > > Made build verbose so that you can check. > (For information, a verbose build log is produced by the make-it-quick build > system under .logs/make.log) > > This comment caught my attention, and I made additional modifications to > make sure > the "hardeing" CFLAGS were correctly captured, basically adding a "fake" > %configure step > that is only used to capture these flags. > > > [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. > > Of note: I may be mistaken, but my experiments tend to demonstrate that the > interesting flags (hardening) are only setup if you run %configure. As > written > above, %configure step added with "fake" configure script for that purpose. > Let me know if there is a better way. > If make-it-quick is looking for CFLAGS, etc., then you might want to use %set_build_flags instead of %configure. Though you should make sure that the relevant command-line arguments that %configure passes are applied. Probably most of them are not useful if you don't install anything to all those directories. > > > - Don't use %{__install} macros (also the cd is kind of unneeded). > > Done. Would you be kind enough to share the rationale? (I'm sort of new to > Fedora packaging) > They're simply unrequired and obfuscate the spec unnecessarily. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros > > - ldconfig post(un) scriptlets are no longer necessary. > > Removed. > > Do you think this is also true on other distros (trying to make sure my > .spec is reasonably reusable). I wouldn't know, sorry.
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #4) > (In reply to Christophe de Dinechin from comment #2) > > (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #1) > > > - You don't need Requires:qt5-qtcharts as the executable is linked > > > with the library and will have automatic dependency on it. > > > > OK. Is it harmful? I see it as useful documentation. Left it for now. > > > > As you can see from the Requires list, you'll have > libQt5Charts.so.5()(64bit) and libQt5Charts.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) already, which > contain more information than the package name. Also, it seems that you > removed it anyway? Yes. I took the general approach that since I'm new here, I would just follow directions ;-) > > > - The makefile is not verbose, so I cannot verify if the required flags are > > > being used from the log. > > > > Made build verbose so that you can check. > > (For information, a verbose build log is produced by the make-it-quick build > > system under .logs/make.log) > > > > This comment caught my attention, and I made additional modifications to > > make sure > > the "hardeing" CFLAGS were correctly captured, basically adding a "fake" > > %configure step > > that is only used to capture these flags. > > > > > [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. > > > > Of note: I may be mistaken, but my experiments tend to demonstrate that the > > interesting flags (hardening) are only setup if you run %configure. As > > written > > above, %configure step added with "fake" configure script for that purpose. > > Let me know if there is a better way. > > > > If make-it-quick is looking for CFLAGS, etc., then you might want to use > %set_build_flags instead of %configure. Though you should make sure that the > relevant command-line arguments that %configure passes are applied. Probably > most of them are not useful if you don't install anything to all those > directories. I used the configure template from make-it-quick that plays exactly that role. It seems a better way to pass libdir, etc than passing it directly to make (though I still have to pass it to qmake, but that's a different build system) > > > > > > - Don't use %{__install} macros (also the cd is kind of unneeded). > > > > Done. Would you be kind enough to share the rationale? (I'm sort of new to > > Fedora packaging) > > > > They're simply unrequired and obfuscate the spec unnecessarily. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros I see. Thanks for the link. I believe you refer to the fact that "install" would be shorter than %{__install}. That prompted me to go the extra mile and add a proper `make install` for the qt part. It's cleaner that way anyway, so thanks for pointing it out :-) > > > > - ldconfig post(un) scriptlets are no longer necessary. > > > > Removed. > > > > Do you think this is also true on other distros (trying to make sure my > > .spec is reasonably reusable). > > I wouldn't know, sorry. OK. Many packages have this in their .spec file. I'll address that when the time comes.
Approved.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/recorder
You need to submit an update for this if you want it available on Fedora 30. You'll also need to build it for Rawhide.
FEDORA-2019-c5dcef4685 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c5dcef4685
recorder-1.0.8-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c5dcef4685
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #8) > You need to submit an update for this if you want it available on Fedora 30. > You'll also need to build it for Rawhide. Hi, the update for F30 went through, but I had an error message: Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: 'anonymous' A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last The udpate for F31 won't go through, I get: Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Build does not exist: recorder-1.0.8-1.fc31 You may not specify an empty list of builds. ACL validation mechanism was unable to determine ACLs. There is a build, however. What am I doing wrong?
(In reply to Christophe de Dinechin from comment #11) > > There is a build, however. What am I doing wrong? I forgot the link to the build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35339817.
The error is a known issue, but it should have gone through fine: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3255 You don't need to make an update for Rawhide. Builds are available immediately after they're done (or more specifically, once a compose goes through.)
recorder-1.0.8-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.