Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/twoerner/ansible-freeipa/ansible-freeipa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/twoerner/ansible-freeipa/ansible-freeipa-0.1.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Roles and playbooks to deploy FreeIPA servers, replicas and clients Fedora Account System Username: twoerner
Taken. Expect a review with 24 hours.
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34742464 rpmlint output (warnings are spurious): $ rpmlint ansible-freeipa.spec ansible-freeipa-0.1.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm ansible-freeipa-0.1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm ansible-freeipa.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gssapi -> sapping ansible-freeipa.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gssapi -> sapping 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
MUST: * rpmlint [OK] * naming [OK] * spec file naming [OK] * Packaging Guidelines [OK] with no remark * license within the licensing guidelines [OK] * license matches upstream [OK] * %license is used [OK] * sources match [OK] * builds (into noarch) [OK] * build deps [OK] * locale [not applicable] * shared lib (ldconfig) [not applicable] * no bundled lib [OK] * relocatable [not applicable] * owning directories [OK] * files not listed more than once [OK] * permissions [OK] * macros [OK] * code/permissible content [OK] * documentation [OK] * static libs/dev files [not applicable] * no .la [OK] * GUI apps [not applicable] * not own other packages' files or directories [OK] * filesnames are UTF-8 [OK] * dependencies on deprecated packages [OK] Result: PASS. Please consider separating the doc files into a separate package. Considering the current size it is in no way necessary but please do it in a future release. SHOULD: * license [already in, OK] * mock [OK, see scratch above] All other SHOULD items are not applicable.
Review result: PASS with a single, non-binding comment. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-freeipa