Bug 170891 - Improve integration of evolution and gnome-panel
Summary: Improve integration of evolution and gnome-panel
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-panel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dave Malcolm
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 172234
Blocks: Yellowpad
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-10-15 03:11 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-27 20:45:16 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Bugzilla 162305 0 None None None Never
GNOME Bugzilla 270751 0 None None None Never

Description Matthias Clasen 2005-10-15 03:11:46 UTC
Double-clicking on the panel clock's calendar brings up the evolution calendar,
but it doesn't show the day that was selected in the clock's calendar. It should.

Also, it should close the clock's calendar and use startup notification, since
it takes some time for evolution to come up.

Comment 1 Dave Malcolm 2005-10-27 22:26:19 UTC
Yes, it seems to come up with a new window containing whatever view the last
calendar window had selected (e.g. week view, month view, etc).  I agree that it
should show the day view for the day you double-clicked on.

Comment 2 Dave Malcolm 2005-11-01 19:43:02 UTC
Looks like the necessary work has already been done and is sitting unapplied in
upstream bugzilla; gnome-panel clock needs patching, evolution doesn't:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162305

Changing component to gnome-panel and reassigning.

Comment 3 Dave Malcolm 2005-11-01 19:44:58 UTC
Oops; didn't see the evolution patch as well...

So both evolution and gnome-panel will need patching...

Comment 4 Dave Malcolm 2005-11-01 19:50:18 UTC
(I created bug 172234 to track the necessary work to evolution that will need to
happen before the gnome-panel patch will work)

Comment 5 Dave Malcolm 2005-11-01 20:06:44 UTC
Reassigning back to me to keep it easier to work on.

Comment 6 Christopher Aillon 2006-01-27 20:45:16 UTC
We'll pull this in when it gets into upstream.  There are appropriate upstream
bugs which will handle it and there's no reason to diverge from them, which
could potentially introduce bugs.  Marking UPSTREAM.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.