Hide Forgot
Description of problem: There is an conflict between libzip-devel and minizip-devel in /usr/include/zip.h, so only one of them can installed. Such conflicts are not allowed, please see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libzip-devel-1.5.2-1.fc30.ppc64le minizip-devel-2.8.6-1.fc30.ppc64le How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install libzip-devel 2. dnf install minizip-devel Actual results: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/include/zip.h from install of minizip-devel-2.8.6-1.fc30.ppc64le conflicts with file from package libzip-devel-1.5.2-1.fc30.ppc64le Expected results: both libzip-devel and minizip-devel will be installed
Dan, I agree implicit conflicts are not allowed, but in this case, I believe we will need explicit "Conflict:" in RPMs -- it doesn't seem to me like a valid use case to have both *zip-devel libraries installed. Just checking whether I'm not missing something -- do you see any issue with specifying "Conflict:" in both *zip-devel RPMs?
I would say one can use either the explicit Conflits (especially when libzip and minizip implement different "zip" API) or try moving minizip headers into /usr/include/minizip. It might work well as there is both pkgconfig and cmake detection support in minizip-devel.
I went with moving minizip header files into a minizip subdirectory as this solution is more inline with some other major distributions.
FEDORA-2019-fd197ee97f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fd197ee97f
minizip-2.8.8-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fd197ee97f
(In reply to Honza Horak from comment #1) > Dan, I agree implicit conflicts are not allowed, but in this case, I believe > we will need explicit "Conflict:" in RPMs -- it doesn't seem to me like a > valid use case to have both *zip-devel libraries installed. Just checking > whether I'm not missing something -- do you see any issue with specifying > "Conflict:" in both *zip-devel RPMs? After talking to Patrik, this comment doesn't seem valid at all, feel free to ignore it.
minizip-2.8.8-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.