Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1710089

Summary:	[RFE] Framework to deploy an undercloud minion
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Alex Schultz <aschultz>
Component:	python-tripleoclient	Assignee:	Alex Schultz <aschultz>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Aharon Canan <acanan>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	16.0 (Train)	CC:	amcleod, bdobreli, hbrock, jamsmith, jcoufal, jschluet, jslagle, mbarnett, mburns, mcornea, nlevinki, pweeks
Target Milestone:	beta	Keywords:	FutureFeature, TechPreview, Triaged
Target Release:	16.0 (Train on RHEL 8.1)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-tripleoclient-12.3.1-0.20191115200343.315f6d4.el8ost	Doc Type:	Technology Preview
Doc Text:	Director has added the `overcloud undercloud minion install` command that you can use to configure an additional host to augment the Undercloud services.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-02-06 14:40:18 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1710092, 1710093, 1710392, 1771551, 1778810

Description Alex Schultz 2019-05-14 20:44:51 UTC

Description of problem:

We would like to be able to secondary 'undercloud' host that can be used to add additional capacity or services for the undercloud. 

1) There should be an additional cli command to install an "undercloud minion"
2) There should be an additional cli command to upgrade an "undercloud minion"
3) The installation should be configuration file driven
4) The minion should be able to have various services and networking information configurable so the end user can scale only a specific set of services.

Additional info:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/undercloud-minion
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/train/undercloud-minion.html

Comment 1 Bogdan Dobrelya 2019-05-15 08:08:52 UTC

I'm going to assist with the distributing Ironic Conductor. There is an Edge DCN case for it, where we want it placed at the edge for better scale and no L2 requirement when provisioning computes at the edge sites.

Comment 2 Bogdan Dobrelya 2019-05-15 14:26:19 UTC

To clarify, I meant placing Ironic conductor at the central site running those additional UC minions. And there is only a vague option to extend the scope for the Edge DCN as well, if the scope allows that...

Comment 3 Alex Schultz 2019-05-15 14:49:26 UTC

ironic-conductor would be handled under Bug 1710093. This is the framework itself

Comment 5 Alex Schultz 2019-06-03 15:36:56 UTC

Moving to Milestone 2 as the code hasn't landed yet.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-02-06 14:40:18 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:0283