Bug 1711231 - Getting error "undefined method `>' for nil:NilClass [vm_cloud/explorer]" while accessing cloudforms instance
Summary: Getting error "undefined method `>' for nil:NilClass [vm_cloud/explorer]" whi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1624535
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.9.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: cfme-future
Assignee: Adam Grare
QA Contact: Omri Hochman
Red Hat CloudForms Documentation
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-05-17 09:48 UTC by Nikhil Gupta
Modified: 2019-11-06 20:00 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-20 07:13:36 UTC
Category: Bug
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Error screenshot (125.65 KB, image/png)
2019-05-17 09:48 UTC, Nikhil Gupta
no flags Details

Description Nikhil Gupta 2019-05-17 09:48:36 UTC
Created attachment 1569991 [details]
Error screenshot

Description of problem:
Cannot see content on cfme instance running on OpenStack provider.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OpenStack 10
cfme-5.9

How reproducible:
Alwasy

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run an cfme instance without flavor on OSP10
2. Add OSP10 provider to CF
3. Go to Compute -> Clouds -> Tenants -> Click on tenant -> Click on Instances
4. Then click on 'cfme' instance

Actual results:
~~~
Unexpected error encountered
Error text:
undefined method `>' for nil:NilClass [vm_cloud/explorer]
~~~

Expected results:
Should be able to access instance details.

Comment 3 Adam Grare 2019-05-17 11:25:36 UTC
This looks like a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624535
What version exactly is the customer on?

Comment 4 Nikhil Gupta 2019-05-20 07:13:36 UTC
It cfme-5.9.4. After updating the cloudforms to latest version i.e. 5.9.9, I am not seeing this issue.

Thank you Adam.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1624535 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.