Bug 1711606 - Preemption ExecutionPath e2e test fails
Summary: Preemption ExecutionPath e2e test fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kube-scheduler
Version: 4.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.3.0
Assignee: Mike Dame
QA Contact: RamaKasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-05-18 23:25 UTC by Clayton Coleman
Modified: 2020-03-10 23:53 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-10 23:52:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:0676 0 None None None 2020-03-10 23:53:09 UTC

Description Clayton Coleman 2019-05-18 23:25:03 UTC 
https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/22858/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws/8784#openshift-tests-sig-scheduling-preemptionexecutionpath-runs-replicasets-to-verify-preemption-running-path-suiteopenshiftconformanceparallel-suitek8s

fail [k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/scheduling/preemption.go:639]: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003fe31e0>: {
        s: "replicaset \"rs-pod1\" never had desired number of .status.availableReplicas",
    }
    replicaset "rs-pod1" never had desired number of .status.availableReplicas
occurred
	

Test is currently disabled
Comment 4 Maciej Szulik 2020-02-26 19:26:17 UTC 
I think this problem haven't appeared in a while, sending to qa for verification.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2020-03-10 23:52:55 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0676
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.