Bug 17124 - Informix/6.2E using raw filesystems panics "unable to swap"
Summary: Informix/6.2E using raw filesystems panics "unable to swap"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 6.2EE
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-08-31 03:36 UTC by Stuart E. Johnson
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-08-31 13:46:33 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Stuart E. Johnson 2000-08-31 03:36:38 UTC
Please see Bugzilla report 17123 for a preamble to this problem.

At Mark Rusk's (Dell Preferred Customer Support) direction, I rebuilt the 
kernel-2.2.14-6.1.1 RPM with lfs disabled. This resulted in a
new RPM, kernel-2.2.14-6.0.1. I installed and booted the new kernel, then 
asked the Informix dba to re-run their installation procedure.

The kernel paniced in the kvm subsystem, reporting "unable to swap". The 
customer has yet to give me permission to publish the kernel stack trace 
here. I will append it to this report as soon as I am given permission.

On a hunch I disabled BIGMEM and rebuilt the kernel. Informix then 
installed without any additional (kernel) problems.
 
Informix states they support any 2.2.x kernel. This is a misstatement. The 
additional features of the 6.2E distribution, specifically lfs and bigmem, 
are not compatible with Informix 9.2.x when using raw filesystems for data 
areas. Informix 9.2.x seems to work correctly with 6.2E and cooked 
(ext2fs) filesystems.

Comment 1 Michael K. Johnson 2000-08-31 13:46:31 UTC
First of all, you want the 2.2.16-4 6.2E errata kernel update
or the 2.2.16-3 6.2 errata kernel update that fix the known
capabilities compromise.

It's interesting to know that turning off BIGMEM caused this
problem to go away, but without a decoded trace we have no
real chance of fixing it.  (Of course, there's even a possibility
that this is fixed in our 2.2.16 kernels; you should use the
non-enterprse 2.2.16-3 kernel since you can't use lfs.)

Comment 2 Stuart E. Johnson 2000-09-06 16:40:43 UTC
This was indeed fixed in 2.2.16-4.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.