Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 171304
sata_promise: missing PCI ID for SATA300 TX4
Last modified: 2013-07-02 22:25:41 EDT
Description of problem: 00:0d.0 Mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20718 (SATA 300 TX4) (rev 02) is not picked up by the sata_promise driver. http://www.hr.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13-rc5/2.6.13-rc5-mm1/broken-out/activate-sata300-tx4-in-sata_promise.patch fixes it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.6.9-22.EL How reproducible: always # lspci -v -n -s 00:0d.0 00:0d.0 Class 0180: 105a:3d17 (rev 02) Subsystem: 105a:3d17 Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 72, IRQ 11 I/O ports at 9800 [size=128] I/O ports at 9400 [size=256] Memory at f9000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Memory at f8800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2
I have incorporated the patch in the test kernels here: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/rhel4/ Please verify that those kernels properly support the hardware in question...thanks!
2.6.9-22.13.EL.jwltest.83 looks good, thanks John. [root@media ~]# uname -r 2.6.9-22.13.EL.jwltest.83 [root@media ~]# dmesg ... scsi5 : sata_promise Vendor: ATA Model: HDS722525VLSA80 Rev: V36O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 ...
Looks like jgarzik has this in hand...
Confirmed fixed also in 2.6.9-27.EL though this bug is not referenced from the %changelog.
committed in stream U4 build 34.27. A test kernel with this patch is available from http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0575.html