Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 171573 - Biarch dependency problems.
Biarch dependency problems.
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Nasrat
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2005-10-23 10:32 EDT by David Woodhouse
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-07 21:20:31 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
install log (15.46 KB, text/plain)
2005-10-23 10:32 EDT, David Woodhouse 		no flags Details
Anaconda log with depsolving output (8.57 MB, text/plain)
2005-10-23 13:25 EDT, Paul Nasrat 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description David Woodhouse 2005-10-23 10:32:49 EDT 
A clean install on ppc64 installed ppc32 pam, but not ppc32 cracklib, on which
that depends. This causes pam_cracklib.so to fail, so changing password always
fails.
Comment 1 David Woodhouse 2005-10-23 10:32:49 EDT 
Created attachment 120287 [details]
install log
Comment 2 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-23 13:13:22 EDT 
Casual inspection shows .so requires should pull in both:

libcrack.so.2
libcrack.so.2()(64bit)

21:28:18 INFO    : pam requires: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Requiring package is from transaction set
21:28:18 INFO    : Resolving for requiring package: pam-0.80-11 in state u
21:28:18 INFO    : Resolving for requirement: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Searching pkgSack for dep: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Potential match for cracklib from cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc
21:28:18 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc to require for cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Potential match for cracklib from cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64
21:28:18 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 to require for cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : TSINFO: Marking cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 as install for pam

Dep Number: 2108/2355

21:28:34 INFO    : pam requires: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Requiring package is from transaction set
21:28:34 INFO    : Resolving for requiring package: pam-0.80-11 in state u
21:28:34 INFO    : Resolving for requirement: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Searching pkgSack for dep: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Potential match for libcrack.so.2()(64bit) from cracklib -
2.8.5-2.ppc64
21:28:34 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 to require for
libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : cracklib already in ts, skipping this one
21:28:34 INFO    :
Comment 3 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-23 13:25:48 EDT 
Created attachment 120293 [details]
Anaconda log with depsolving output
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2005-11-07 21:20:31 EST 
This should be fixed now
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.