Bug 171573 – Biarch dependency problems.

Bug 171573 - Biarch dependency problems.

Summary:	Biarch dependency problems.

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	anaconda (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Paul Nasrat
QA Contact:	Mike McLean
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-10-23 10:32 EDT by David Woodhouse
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-11-07 21:20:31 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
install log (15.46 KB, text/plain) 2005-10-23 10:32 EDT, David Woodhouse	no flags	Details
Anaconda log with depsolving output (8.57 MB, text/plain) 2005-10-23 13:25 EDT, Paul Nasrat	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description David Woodhouse 2005-10-23 10:32:49 EDT

A clean install on ppc64 installed ppc32 pam, but not ppc32 cracklib, on which
that depends. This causes pam_cracklib.so to fail, so changing password always
fails.

Comment 1 David Woodhouse 2005-10-23 10:32:49 EDT

Created attachment 120287 [details]
install log

Comment 2 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-23 13:13:22 EDT

Casual inspection shows .so requires should pull in both:

libcrack.so.2
libcrack.so.2()(64bit)

21:28:18 INFO    : pam requires: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Requiring package is from transaction set
21:28:18 INFO    : Resolving for requiring package: pam-0.80-11 in state u
21:28:18 INFO    : Resolving for requirement: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Searching pkgSack for dep: cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Potential match for cracklib from cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc
21:28:18 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc to require for cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : Potential match for cracklib from cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64
21:28:18 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 to require for cracklib
21:28:18 INFO    : TSINFO: Marking cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 as install for pam

Dep Number: 2108/2355

21:28:34 INFO    : pam requires: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Requiring package is from transaction set
21:28:34 INFO    : Resolving for requiring package: pam-0.80-11 in state u
21:28:34 INFO    : Resolving for requirement: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Searching pkgSack for dep: libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : Potential match for libcrack.so.2()(64bit) from cracklib -
2.8.5-2.ppc64
21:28:34 INFO    : Matched cracklib - 2.8.5-2.ppc64 to require for
libcrack.so.2()(64bit)
21:28:34 INFO    : cracklib already in ts, skipping this one
21:28:34 INFO    :

Comment 3 Paul Nasrat 2005-10-23 13:25:48 EDT

Created attachment 120293 [details]
Anaconda log with depsolving output

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2005-11-07 21:20:31 EST

This should be fixed now

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.