Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
we found that bug is seems only for Ansible Playbook and not for any other provider catalog type
Hey Bill, GM said that https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb#L139 is supposed to have all the options from the angular UI that it needs to be able to successfully do this service template update. ServiceTemplate.last.update_catalog_item({:name=>"Updated Service Name", :description=>"Updated Service Description"}, User.first) NoMethodError: undefined method `key?' for nil:NilClass from /var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb:118:in `validate_config_info' from /var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb:227:in `validate_update_config_info' from /var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb:139:in `update_catalog_item' I don't know anything about this, could you please tell me how it's supposed to work?
We should by pass the validation and update of config_info unless it presents. Please follow the same pattern in ServiceTemplateAnsibleTower to create a fix.
This isn't an API bug at all per comment 3.
Per https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/a8947bca9cf190989a365d9eee38aafc23934683 though I think this should, rather than Bill's suggestion, look more like the code in that PR at app/models/service_template_ansible_tower.rb because I think we support update without config_info.
Meeeeeee. Sorry, so busy. Here's the issue I'm having. https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/a8947bca9cf190989a365d9eee38aafc23934683#diff-6e711c8868f44a0279bbeb7815bf8135R230 means we at one point thought you could run an update without config_info being present. Bill's comment makes me think that that shouldn't be the case and I don't know what the right thing to do here is. Tina, I don't know what to do here.
Drew your example is a spec for ServiceTemplate. As mentioned earlier the fix is to follow the example of https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/service_template_ansible_tower.rb#L76. The fix should be made in class ServiceTemplateAnsiblePlaybook.
Bill, we pass options in here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb#L226 and then never use them. I know which file needs the change you're talking about. But that method looks like it's doing the wrong thing anyway at the moment.
I put in the link to the spec to service template because that's what the service template ansible playbook is calling when it calls super: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/service_template_ansible_playbook.rb#L227
solved through https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/18981
It means I'm working on it right now.
FIXED. Verified on 5.11.0.16.20190724210259_2b4aa51.