Bug 171838 - CVE-2006-7176 sendmail allows external mail with from address xxx
Summary: CVE-2006-7176 sendmail allows external mail with from address xxx@localhost.l...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sendmail
Version: 4.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Thomas Woerner
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-10-26 21:32 UTC by nathan.j.olson
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHSA-2007-0252
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-01 17:12:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 54188 0 medium CLOSED sendmail allows external mail with from address xxx@localhost.localdomain 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2007:0252 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: sendmail security and bug fix update 2007-05-01 17:11:07 UTC

Description nathan.j.olson 2005-10-26 21:32:44 UTC
Description of problem:
When an external SMTP session is established, and an address of
"xxx" is specified on the MAIL FROM: line, sendmail
blindly accepts this as valid.  Note that "xxx@localhost" is rejected by
sendmail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sendmail-8.13.1-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. from a remote host, telnet host 25
2. EHLO foobar.redhat.com
3. MAIL FROM: <xxx>
  
Actual results:
220 vaccine1.NoDak.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.1/8.13.1; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:17:42 -
0500
EHLO nate.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu
250-vaccine1.NoDak.edu Hello nate.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu [134.129.106.131], pleased 
to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 26214400
250-DSN
250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
MAIL FROM: root@localhost
553 5.5.4 root@localhost... Real domain name required for sender address
MAIL FROM: root
250 2.1.0 root... Sender ok

Expected results:
220 vaccine1.NoDak.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.1/8.13.1; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:17:42 -
0500
EHLO nate.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu
250-vaccine1.NoDak.edu Hello nate.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu [134.129.106.131], pleased 
to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 26214400
250-DSN
250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
MAIL FROM: root@localhost
553 5.5.4 root@localhost... Real domain name required for sender address
MAIL FROM: root
553 5.5.4 root... Real domain name required for sender 
address

Additional info:
In /etc/mail/sendmail.cf, checks are made for various "localhost" addresses. 
"localhost.localdomain" is missing:

# handle case of @localhost on address
R<@> < $* @ localhost > $: < ? $&{client_name} > < $1 @ localhost >

The following line wants adding to this:
R<@> < $* @ localhost.localdomain >     $: < ? $&{client_name} > < $1 @
localhost.localdomain >

Note that localhost.localdomain still remains valid for local use, but not
for remote SMTP use.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2006-08-18 17:08:10 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 5 Josh Bressers 2006-10-02 21:10:08 UTC
I'm having a hard time understanding how this is a security vulnerability.  What
can be gained by sending mail as root?

Comment 9 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-05-01 17:12:07 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0252.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.