Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jamatos/nikola-playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00929276-python-smartypants/python-smartypants.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jamatos/nikola-playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00929276-python-smartypants/python-smartypants-2.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: smartypants is a Python fork of SmartyPants Fedora Account System Username: jamatos
- The current source is 404? Pypi doesn't seem to provide the archive. The requested URL returned error: 404 Use: Source0: %url/archive/v%{version}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz - Please use a more detailed Summary/Description: what is SmartyPants, what does it do - The license shorthand should be License: BSD - You should use the GitHub archive to run the tests %check %{__python3} setup.py test - Remove shebang of Python scripts in %prep (including the tests files which fails otherwise) python3-smartypants.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/smartypants.py 644 /usr/bin/python for lib in $(find -type f -name '*.py'); do sed '1{\@^#!@d}' $lib > $lib.new && touch -r $lib $lib.new && mv $lib.new $lib done sed 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|' smartypants > smartypants.new && touch -r smartypants smartypants.new && mv smartypants.new smartypants chmod +x smartypants - Capitalize summary: python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C smartypants documentation Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (unspecified)". 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-smartypants/review-python- smartypants/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-smartypants [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-smartypants-2.0.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python-smartypants-doc-2.0.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python-smartypants-2.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm python3-smartypants.noarch: W: invalid-license BSD License python3-smartypants.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/smartypants.py 644 /usr/bin/python python3-smartypants.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary smartypants python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C smartypants documentation python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: invalid-license BSD License python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/python-smartypants-doc/html/objects.inv python-smartypants.src: W: invalid-license BSD License 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
Thank you Robert-André. I have accepted all your proposals in the new version: * Tue Jun 11 2019 José Matos <jamatos> - 2.0.1-2 - fix source url, license short hand, description and summary. - remove shebang lines and make smartypants a shebang line use python3. Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-smartypants.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc30.src.rpm
- The goal of touching files: touch -r $lib $lib.new && mv $lib.new $lib is to keep timestamps, removing this will remove original timestamps. - Capitalize summaries: python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C smartypants documentation Summary: plug-in that easily translates ASCII punctuation characters into smart entities Summary: python-smartypants documentation Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > - The goal of touching files: > > touch -r $lib $lib.new && > mv $lib.new $lib > > is to keep timestamps, removing this will remove original timestamps. My reading from the guidelines is that this is not necessary: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_shebang_lines I do not mind changing the timestamps because we are really changing the files. If you insist I will do it but it seems to me overkill to retain the original timestamp. > - Capitalize summaries: > > python-smartypants-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C smartypants > documentation > > > Summary: plug-in that easily translates ASCII punctuation characters > into smart entities > > Summary: python-smartypants documentation > > > Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import. I will fix the first. The second seems to me that it is not necessary, the name of the package is in small caps. :-)
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-smartypants
FEDORA-2019-adb5f08aab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-adb5f08aab
FEDORA-2019-f41461c169 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f41461c169
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc30, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc30, python-phpserialize-1.3-2.fc30, python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc30, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-adb5f08aab
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29, python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f41461c169
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29, python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc30, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc30, python-phpserialize-1.3-2.fc30, python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc30, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.