Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 171990 - add hplj1020 driver
add hplj1020 driver
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 118983
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: foomatic (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks: FC6Target
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-10-28 16:02 EDT by Rik van Riel
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-07-17 04:38:51 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Rik van Riel 2005-10-28 16:02:53 EDT
Description of problem:

# system-config-printer
No match for USB device:
  mfr "Hewlett-Packard"
  model "HP LaserJet 1020"
  desc "HP LaserJet 1020"
  cmdset "ACL"
Please report this message in Bugzilla:
Choose 'foomatic' as the component.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Comment 1 Rik van Riel 2005-10-28 16:26:43 EDT
It looks like most of the HP LaserJet 10xx series might need this:

Comment 2 James Boyle 2005-10-30 09:23:44 EST
Using driver from support.ideainformatica isn't completely adequate since
printing in US Letter Page Size yields a horizontally ghosted printout -- one
vertical line appears as 12 vertical dotted lines about 2mm apart.  Using
1200x600 with 8.5x11 paper size gives squashed (as one might expect, by half)
and slightly offset output (to the left of the page), though it is not ghosted.
 The best (working) output is obtained from using the A4 Paper size, but being
in the US i'm stocked with 8.5x11...

A l'ill help from any printer driver gurus would be much appreciated! 

Comment 3 Rik van Riel 2006-07-16 09:51:32 EDT
Things seem to work fine with the latest foo2zjs version.
Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2006-07-17 04:38:51 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 118983 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.