It is not clearly stated in the official documentation of RHHI-V deployment today that only RHVH hosts are supported for the general audience and creates confusion. I suggest to add a note to chapter 5 of the deployment guide to make more clear: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure_for_virtualization/1.6/html/deploying_red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure_for_virtualization/install-host-physical-machines Here is the KCS that describes the details, if needed: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4222731
We link directly to the appropriate installation process [1] for RHV Host, and we state in Requirements the appropriate versions of RHV Host to use [2]. @Marina, how do you think we could be clearer or more explicit here? Generally it is more difficult and cumbersome to specifically call out what we do *not* support, rather than including only what we do support. [1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.3/html/installing_red_hat_virtualization_as_a_self-hosted_engine_using_the_cockpit_web_interface/installing_the_self-hosted_engine_deployment_host_she_cockpit_deploy#Installing_Red_Hat_Virtualization_Hosts_SHE_deployment_host [2] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure_for_virtualization/1.6/html/deploying_red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure_for_virtualization/rhhi-requirements#rhhi-req-os
Laura, I understand. But we must clearly state what we support and we do not right now. One suggestion would be what we do in RHV docs - add RHVH in brackets to make it more clear maybe? Like this: "Red Hat Virtualization Host (RHVH) " each time you say "Red Hat Virtualization Host" in the links we have here (yours [2] and mine).
Thank you! Yes.
There are the couple of sections that clearly has the important sign-board to make use of 'Red Hat Virtualization Host' and no RHEL host
Laura, Is that change also part of single node deployment guide ?