Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 product line. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 172092

Summary: CVE-2004-0079 OpenSSL remote DoS
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Bastien Nocera <bnocera>
Component: opensslAssignee: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: jorton, security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: public=20040317,impact=important
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-829 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-02 13:07:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
ssl_core.pl
none
openssl-can-2004-0079.patch none

Comment 3 Mark J. Cox 2005-10-31 12:03:29 UTC 
This flaw was originally believed to only affect versions of OpenSSL after
0.9.6b as proved and verified with Codenomicon test suite (pkt539.c as
distributed to vendors via NISCC from OpenSSL).  Customer has however supplied
an alternative reproducer that proves this can be triggered in older versions too.
Comment 5 Mark J. Cox 2005-11-01 09:13:26 UTC 
Errata RHSA-2005:829 in progress to correct this flaw.
Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-11-02 13:07:04 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-829.html