Description of problem: If texinfo files are detected (existence of /usr/share/info/* in any subpackage) and install-info cannot be found in the %post or %preun sections (must be present in both of them), it informs about it but the mentioned URL to documentation doesn't exist anymore. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-review-0.7.2-1.fc30.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install a source rpm package containing texinfo 2. Comment out the commands executing 'install-info' from %post or %preun sections 3. Rebuild the srpm 4. Run fedora-review on it Actual results: The below url doesn't exist: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_texinfo fedora-review output: ~~~ - Texinfo files are installed using install-info in %post and %preun if package has .info files. Note: Texinfo .info file(s) in frr See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Scriptlets/#_texinfo ~~~ Expected results: Valid URL or removal of it. Additional info: Found some draft for it still hanging around: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo Related code: /usr/share/fedora-review/plugins/generic.py: ~~~ 42 def in_list(what, list_): 43 """ test if 'what' is in each item in list_. """ 44 for item in list_: 45 if not item: 46 return False 47 if what not in item: 48 return False 49 return True ... 1918 class CheckInfoInstall(GenericCheckBase): 1919 """ Check that info files are properly installed. """ 1920 1921 def __init__(self, base): 1922 GenericCheckBase.__init__(self, base) 1923 self.url = ( 1924 "https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US" 1925 "/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_texinfo" 1926 ) 1927 self.text = ( 1928 "Texinfo files are installed using install-info" 1929 " in %post and %preun if package has .info files." 1930 ) 1931 self.automatic = True 1932 self.type = "MUST" 1933 1934 def run(self): 1935 using = [] 1936 failed = False 1937 for pkg in self.spec.packages: 1938 if self.rpms.find("/usr/share/info/*", pkg): 1939 using.append(pkg) 1940 rpm_pkg = self.rpms.get(pkg) 1941 if not in_list("install-info", [rpm_pkg.post, rpm_pkg.preun]): 1942 failed = True 1943 if not using: 1944 self.set_passed(self.NA) 1945 return 1946 text = "Texinfo .info file(s) in " + ", ".join(using) 1947 self.set_passed(self.FAIL if failed else self.PENDING, text) ~~~ Hit this while reviewing frr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702720#c9
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 31 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 31 on 2020-11-24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '31'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 31 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 31 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2020-11-24. Fedora 31 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
I just hit this again in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011