Description of problem:
.la files aren't strictly needed on Linux and causes a lot of problems when
compiling since they hardcode absolute paths to dependent libraries.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
Please everyone stop filing these bugs and go fix actual problems rather than
papering over the symptoms. The .la files are part of the interface.
Well there seems to be agreement on this among a lot of your fellow colleagues
and after talking with no less than four or five of them about this I decided to
file bugs against the remaining ones I could find on my system. They've already
been removed from 80% of the existing packages in fedora from what I can see, so
how can the remaining 20% be part of the interface?
There are two cases it breaks:
1) where the package uses the .la file as a well-defined portable interface to
link against the library (`neon-config --la-file`)
2) where other applications will use ltdl to open the library
and you need to first determine whether or not one of these cases applies before
filing these blanket "remove the .la file" requests.
Ok, thanks for the clarification and sorry for any noise created by filing these