Bug 1726742 - Review Request: python-box - Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Summary: Review Request: python-box - Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation a...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miro Hrončok
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1674656 1726843
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-03 15:34 UTC by David Moreau Simard
Modified: 2019-07-18 17:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-18 17:53:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mhroncok: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Moreau Simard 2019-07-03 15:34:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/blob/master/box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-03 21:36:02 UTC
Please make sure the spec name == package name and that the links here are to the actual content and not HTML pages. FedoraReview tries to download them and fails.

Comment 2 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-04 14:12:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 3 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-04 14:16:52 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/python-box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-04 14:50:52 UTC
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{srcname}}

This will eventually provide python-python-box. is that intended?

------

I suggest using tagged license source: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cdgriffith/Box/%{version}/LICENSE

Have you asked upstream to include it in sdist?


------

BuildRequires:  python3-pytest-runner

But no %check, why?

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-04 14:52:27 UTC
Checking: python3-box-3.4.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          python-box-3.4.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
python3-box.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access.

Please remove the dot.

python3-box.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag

Please add %changelog.

python3-box.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/box.py /usr/bin/env python
python3-box.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/box.py 644 /usr/bin/env python

Please remove that shebang.

python3-box.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary box.py

Feel free to ignore that.

python-box.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access.
python-box.src: E: no-changelogname-tag
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings.

Comment 6 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-05 14:13:53 UTC
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{srcname}}
> 
> This will eventually provide python-python-box. is that intended?
>

It's not. The project on PyPi is python-box and on GitHub it's box.
I suppose we don't need a "box" package and only a "python3-box" package.

> 
> I suggest using tagged license source:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cdgriffith/Box/%{version}/LICENSE

Sure.

> 
> Have you asked upstream to include it in sdist?
> 

I had not but I just opened an issue about it: https://github.com/cdgriffith/Box/issues/92

> 
> BuildRequires:  python3-pytest-runner
> 
> But no %check, why?

Because the project won't install without it: https://github.com/cdgriffith/Box/blob/3d221d7b33c1138a6c732a45ac943b201bd7fea2/setup.py#L36

I would like to add a %check macro eventually but I have time constraints right now.

Comment 7 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-05 14:27:21 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/python-box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 8 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-05 14:45:00 UTC
Just noticed that in the last revision, the shebangs are not translated properly -- from "#!/usr/bin/env python" to "#!/usr/bin/python3 -s -s".

Trying to figure that out.

Comment 9 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-05 16:19:47 UTC
(In reply to David Moreau Simard from comment #8)
> Just noticed that in the last revision, the shebangs are not translated
> properly -- from "#!/usr/bin/env python" to "#!/usr/bin/python3 -s -s".
> 
> Trying to figure that out.

Dropping "%{py3_shbang_opts}" fixed it for me -- it turns out that "%{__python3}" already supplied a "-s" and py3_shbang_opts was adding a second one.

Comment 10 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-05 16:20:09 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/python-box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 11 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-09 08:33:52 UTC
> it turns out that "%{__python3}" already supplied a "-s"

In fact, %{__python3} doesn't have -s, but %py3_build is trying to add -s and errors liek this, as is tracked in bz1335203.

I'm back at this, sorry for the delay... running automated checks.

Comment 12 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-09 08:48:22 UTC
Anyway the shebang must be removed, not chnaged:

python3-box.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/box.py 644 /usr/bin/python3

Comment 13 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-09 16:18:02 UTC
@Miro, box.py ends up in /usr/bin too: . So I guess we need to keep the shebang for the script in /usr/bin and take out the one from site-packages.

Comment 14 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-09 16:38:12 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/python-box.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python dictionaries with advanced dot notation access
Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard

Comment 15 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-09 18:03:27 UTC
I'm 75% sure the pathfix.py call is redundant an %py3_build and %py3_install will handle that.

Running automated checks once more.

Comment 16 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-09 18:11:19 UTC
Package Review
==============

This package is APPROVED. I strongly suggest to add a %check section that runs the upstream test suite.


Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-box-3.4.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          python-box-3.4.2-1.fc31.src.rpm
python3-box.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary box.py
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/python-box/python-box-3.4.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 48dbb429347c0e5deb55fc71b993a5d54f8110cd39165b9a971cfab83504b34c
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 48dbb429347c0e5deb55fc71b993a5d54f8110cd39165b9a971cfab83504b34c


Requires
--------
python3-box (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python3-box:
    python3-box
    python3.7dist(python-box)
    python3dist(python-box)

Comment 17 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-10 15:17:24 UTC
Thanks Miro, new package request is in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/13297

Comment 18 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-10 15:25:36 UTC
I've reset the fedora-review flag, otherwise that ticket would get closed as invalid. Please leave it at +.

Comment 19 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-10 15:26:09 UTC
I was not fast enough, you need to reopen that ticket.

Comment 20 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-07-10 15:46:14 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-box

Comment 21 David Moreau Simard 2019-07-18 17:53:50 UTC
Built successfully for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36325647


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.