Bug 1726795 - Review Request: mingw-SDL2_ttf - MinGW Windows port of the TrueType font handling library for SDL2
Summary: Review Request: mingw-SDL2_ttf - MinGW Windows port of the TrueType font hand...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-03 18:31 UTC by Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
Modified: 2019-07-23 02:34 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-23 01:07:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2019-07-03 18:31:39 UTC
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-1.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-1.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36021863

Description: SDL2_ttf is a library that allows to easily use TTF fonts (and other formats) for rendering text inside SDL2 applications. This is a MinGW version of this library.

Fedora Account System Username: suve

Note: This is my first time packaging stuff for MinGW; I copy-pasted the whole spec from another mingw-SDL2_something package and edited it using my best judgement. As such, some extra caution during the review may be advised. Thanks in advance.

Comment 1 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2019-07-03 18:47:02 UTC
I've just noticed that I made a typo in the name of the %{pkg_description} macro, as well as defined it in such a way that it contains a leading newline. I've fixed those issues locally; not uploading new spec/srpm since those are minor bugs.

Comment 2 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2019-07-07 15:48:58 UTC
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36106961

Fixed wrong License: tag and some other minor issues.

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-07-12 15:11:45 UTC
Package approved.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "zlib/libpng license", "Expat License",
     "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GPL (v2 or later)", "FSF
     Unlimited License (with Retention)", "zlib/libpng license GNU Lesser
     General Public License (v2.1 or later)", "FreeType License", "BSD
     3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Public domain", "*No copyright*
     Public domain". 284 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-SDL2_ttf/review-
     mingw-SDL2_ttf/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/include/SDL2(mingw32-SDL2_mixer, mingw32-SDL2,
     mingw32-SDL2_image), /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/include/SDL2(mingw64-SDL2_image, mingw64-SDL2,
     mingw64-SDL2_mixer)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     mingw32-SDL2_ttf , mingw64-SDL2_ttf
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
     Note: mingw32-SDL2_ttf : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_ttf.pc mingw64-SDL2_ttf :
     /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_ttf.pc
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mingw32-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc31.noarch.rpm
          mingw64-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc31.noarch.rpm
          mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc31.src.rpm
mingw32-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_ttf.h
mingw32-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_ttf.dll.a
mingw32-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_ttf.dll.a
mingw32-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_ttf.pc
mingw32-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-w64-mingw32
mingw64-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL2/SDL_ttf.h
mingw64-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_ttf.dll.a
mingw64-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL2_ttf.dll.a
mingw64-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/SDL2_ttf.pc
mingw64-SDL2_ttf.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr x86_64-w64-mingw32
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-07-13 18:05:10 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-SDL2_ttf

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2019-07-14 09:48:47 UTC
FEDORA-2019-610f5b0110 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-610f5b0110

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2019-07-14 09:49:56 UTC
FEDORA-2019-9b624327e7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9b624327e7

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-07-15 01:32:20 UTC
mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-610f5b0110

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-07-15 04:23:39 UTC
mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9b624327e7

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-07-23 01:07:45 UTC
mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2019-07-23 02:34:56 UTC
mingw-SDL2_ttf-2.0.15-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.