RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1727093 - rsync: "ABORTING due to invalid path from sender"
Summary: rsync: "ABORTING due to invalid path from sender"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rsync
Version: 8.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.1
Assignee: Tomas Korbar
QA Contact: Ondrej Mejzlik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1771008 1894575
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-04 12:38 UTC by Andrei Stepanov
Modified: 2021-05-18 14:56 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rsync-3.1.3-10.el8
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 14:55:59 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:1622 0 None None None 2021-05-18 14:56:05 UTC

Description Andrei Stepanov 2019-07-04 12:38:43 UTC
rsync hangs up with next error:  rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at generator.c(1278) [generator=3.1.3]

rsync-3.1.3-6.el8.x86_64

How reproducible: always

Could be related to: 

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863334
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569


Steps to Reproduce:
1. mkdir /tmp/emtpy
2. find /usr/bin > /tmp/files_to_remove

# rsync --dry-run --stats --delete -Pav --files-from=/tmp/files_to_remove --ignore-missing-args  --delete-missing-args /tmp/emtpy /
building file list ... 
file has vanished: "/tmp/emtpy/usr"
 0 files...
file has vanished: "/tmp/emtpy/usr"
file has vanished: "/tmp/emtpy/usr/bin"
865 files to consider
ABORTING due to invalid path from sender: usr/bin
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at generator.c(1278) [generator=3.1.3]



On Centos 7 rsync-3.1.2-4.el7.x86_64 works as expected

Comment 1 Tomas Korbar 2020-07-08 10:40:52 UTC
Hi Andrei,
i will work on this. As you stated yourself, the upstream is aware
of this issue. Unfortunately they do not have the official fix yet. I
will try to help things move and then we can decide whether this will
be fixed in rhel 8.

Thanks for reporting this bug, i will keep you updated on the progress.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 14:55:59 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rsync bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1622


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.