Bug 1727181 - Review Request: mingw-speexdsp - A voice compression format (DSP)
Summary: Review Request: mingw-speexdsp - A voice compression format (DSP)
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-04 21:47 UTC by janisozaur+redhat
Modified: 2019-08-01 03:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description janisozaur+redhat 2019-07-04 21:47:33 UTC
Spec URL: https://gist.github.com/janisozaur/e775feaeff586473d2bc1a8169f2b45f/raw/08e67a5ea90df7b035262734dfd3fe749226fae1/mingw-speexdsp.spec
SRPM URL: https://gist.github.com/janisozaur/e775feaeff586473d2bc1a8169f2b45f/raw/08e67a5ea90df7b035262734dfd3fe749226fae1/mingw-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
Speex is a patent-free compression format designed especially for
speech. It is specialized for voice communications at low bit-rates in
the 2-45 kbps range. Possible applications include Voice over IP
(VoIP), Internet audio streaming, audio books, and archiving of speech
data (e.g. voice mail).

This is the DSP package, see the speex package for the codec part.

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-07-12 14:55:30 UTC
 You need to sign the CLA https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_a_Fedora_Account and need to get sponsored too  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group


 - Group: is not used in Fedora

 - libspeexdsp.dll.a is included twice in both subpackages, remove the duplicates.


Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issues before import.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: BUILDSTDERR: warning: File listed twice: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
  root/mingw/lib/libspeexdsp.dll.a
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_duplicate_files


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)", "Expat License", "FSF
     Unlimited License (with Retention) GNU General Public License", "FSF
     Unlimited License (with Retention)". 98 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-
     speexdsp/review-mingw-speexdsp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/doc/speexdsp, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/doc/speexdsp
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     mingw32-speexdsp , mingw64-speexdsp
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
     Note: mingw32-speexdsp : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/speexdsp.pc mingw64-speexdsp :
     /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/speexdsp.pc
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mingw32-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          mingw64-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          mingw-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Speex -> Speer, Speed, Perspex
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kbps -> bps, kips, k bps
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_echo.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_jitter.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_preprocess.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_resampler.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speexdsp_config_types.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speexdsp_types.h
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libspeexdsp.dll.a
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libspeexdsp.dll.a
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/speexdsp.pc
mingw32-speexdsp.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-w64-mingw32
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Speex -> Speer, Speed, Perspex
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kbps -> bps, kips, k bps
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_echo.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_jitter.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_preprocess.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speex_resampler.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speexdsp_config_types.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/speex/speexdsp_types.h
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libspeexdsp.dll.a
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libspeexdsp.dll.a
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/speexdsp.pc
mingw64-speexdsp.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr x86_64-w64-mingw32
mingw-speexdsp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Speex -> Speer, Speed, Perspex
mingw-speexdsp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kbps -> bps, kips, k bps
mingw-speexdsp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US speex -> speed, perspex
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings.

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-07-13 03:15:57 UTC
Your packages are of good quality, I'll sponsor you, please make sure you are subscribed to the required mailing lists:

You must join the fedora devel-announce mailing list. It is a low traffic announcements only list, where important development information is posted.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/

You can join the fedora devel mailing list, where discussions about the development of Fedora are held. This is a high traffic mailing list.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/

Another mailing list you might consider (at least to view the archives) is packaging. This is the mailing list of the Fedora Packaging Committee, who determine the official packaging guidelines for Fedora projects.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/

Read up on "Configure Your Git", "Install the developer client tools", then continue with requesting your repos: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-07-13 22:17:13 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-speexdsp

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2019-07-23 10:53:02 UTC
FEDORA-2019-420e72cc5c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-420e72cc5c

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2019-07-24 01:44:31 UTC
mingw-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-420e72cc5c

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-08-01 03:00:04 UTC
mingw-speexdsp-1.2.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.