Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go2rpm.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-go2rpm-1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Convert Go packages to RPM. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36189744
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-go2rpm.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-go2rpm-1-1.fc31.src.rpm
I guess the primary use case for this is the go2rpm tool and not the Python module, correct? If so, just rename to go2rpm please.
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go2rpm.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go2rpm.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go2rpm-1-1.fc31.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Package APPROVED! Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: go2rpm-1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm go2rpm-1-1.fc31.src.rpm go2rpm.noarch: W: no-documentation go2rpm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary go2rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go2rpm/archive/v1/go2rpm-v1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 5861957a3c0c91a5d80258ac8c8a6a7158784e8115d70e92d9ed6ae5bf2d5ab9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5861957a3c0c91a5d80258ac8c8a6a7158784e8115d70e92d9ed6ae5bf2d5ab9 Requires -------- go2rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3.7dist(aiohttp) python3.7dist(gitpython) python3.7dist(jinja2) python3.7dist(setuptools) Provides -------- go2rpm: go2rpm python3.7dist(go2rpm) python3dist(go2rpm)
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go2rpm
Don't we need askalono for this to work?
Good point I forgot about that.
FEDORA-2019-5c3607491f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5c3607491f
FEDORA-2019-2272678257 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2272678257
go2rpm-1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5c3607491f
go2rpm-1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2272678257
FEDORA-2019-ecfecea33f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ecfecea33f
go2rpm-1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ecfecea33f