Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1732590 - Cannot add filter on same RPM name with different architectures
Summary: Cannot add filter on same RPM name with different architectures
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium with 1 vote
Target Milestone: 6.12.0
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1874361 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-23 19:59 UTC by Lai
Modified: 2023-09-07 20:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-16 13:32:23 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 33855 0 Normal New Cannot add filter on same RPM name with different architectures 2021-11-05 14:58:36 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-13333 0 None None None 2022-10-08 04:43:51 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:8506 0 None None None 2022-11-16 13:32:35 UTC

Description Lai 2019-07-23 19:59:46 UTC 
Description of problem:
You cannot add a filter rule on the same RPM name that has different architectures.  In the reproduction step, I'm using the "rest" rpm from rhel7 server because it has 2 different architecture.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.6.0 snap 12

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Sync rhel7 server RPM
2. Create a CV and add the above repo
3. Yum Content -> filter
4. Create a Package exclusion filter
5. Add rule: name = rest, architecture = x86_64, version = all version
6. Hit save
7. Add another rule: name = rest, architecture = i686, version = all version
8. Hit save

Actual results:
Validation failed: This package filter rule already exists.

Expected results:
Rule added successfully

Additional info:
Rhel7 server rpm has firefox packages with 2 types of rest dependencies.  One "rest" has x86_64 dependency and the other "rest" has "i686" dependency.
Comment 5 Samir Jha 2021-11-05 14:58:35 UTC 
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/33855 from this bug
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2021-11-11 20:01:35 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/33855 has been resolved.
Comment 8 Justin Sherrill 2022-01-24 21:45:40 UTC 
*** Bug 1874361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Lai 2022-07-26 14:26:56 UTC 
Steps to retest:
1. Sync rhel7 server RPM
2. Create a CV and add the above repo
3. Yum Content -> filter
4. Create a RPM exclusion filter
5. Click "Add RPM Rule": name = rest, architecture = x86_64, version = all version
6. Hit Add Rule
7. Add another rule: name = rest, architecture = i686, version = all version
8. Hit Add Rule
9. Publish cv

Actual results:
8) Rule should be added successfully
9) Publishing a cv should be successful

Expected results:
8) Rule added successfully
9) Publishing a cv is successful


Verified on 6.12 snap 3
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-16 13:32:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.12 Release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8506
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.