RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1733419 - The s.st_size > (6144LL * MB) error in the ldb_lmdb_size_test.c file shows that the ldb database cannot meet the test size.
Summary: The s.st_size > (6144LL * MB) error in the ldb_lmdb_size_test.c file shows th...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1794349
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libldb
Version: 7.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Isaac Boukris
QA Contact: sssd-qe
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-26 03:55 UTC by wangye
Modified: 2020-02-05 08:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-05 08:57:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description wangye 2019-07-26 03:55:23 UTC
Description of problem:
The s.st_size > (6144LL * MB) error in the ldb_lmdb_size_test.c file shows that the ldb database cannot meet the test size.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
The latest version also exists

How reproducible:
Make a compilation in ldb, then run ldb_lmdb_size_test directly under /bin/default

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Download ldb source package
2.Compile code with make
3.Run ldb_lmdb_size_test in the /bin/default directory.

Actual results:
[root@localhost default]# ./ldb_lmdb_size_test
[==========] Running 1 test(s).
[ RUN      ] test_db_size_gt_4GB
[  ERROR   ] --- s.st_size > (6144LL * MB)
[   LINE   ] --- ../tests/ldb_lmdb_size_test.c:199: error: Failure!
[  FAILED  ] test_db_size_gt_4GB
[==========] 1 test(s) run.
[  PASSED  ] 0 test(s).
[  FAILED  ] 1 test(s), listed below:
[  FAILED  ] test_db_size_gt_4GB

 1 FAILED TEST(S)


Expected results:

No error, code test can normally check a larger than 4G database size
Additional info:
I suspect that the apitest.ldb file in the code failed to be created. The size does not exceed 4G, but it cannot be modified. Block it.

Comment 2 Isaac Boukris 2019-12-17 09:39:53 UTC
The test pass on my machine:
[ldb]$ ./bin/ldb_lmdb_size_test
[==========] Running 1 test(s).
[ RUN      ] test_db_size_gt_4GB
[       OK ] test_db_size_gt_4GB
[==========] 1 test(s) run.
[  PASSED  ] 1 test(s).

Can you tell more about the rhel version, samba/ldb version, machine arch, hardware specifications and a detailed description how to reproduce ?

Comment 3 Isaac Boukris 2020-02-05 08:57:29 UTC
My mistake, i tested upstream with lmdb support, but in rhel we do not yet supported lmdb as per #1794349 so 4g is the limit, closing as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1794349 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.