Bug 1733801 - Nonreponsive maintainer check for salimma
Summary: Nonreponsive maintainer check for salimma
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-hypothesis
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Alexandre Salim
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-28 18:32 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2019-07-29 08:44 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-07-29 04:36:13 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-28 18:32:11 UTC 
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain python-hypothesis.
Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-28 22:11:56 UTC 
> This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb

mikeb or salimma?

Note that salimma has recently added me as a co-maintainer of python-hypothesis. Should I prioritize bz1714619?
Comment 2 Igor Gnatenko 2019-07-29 04:36:13 UTC 
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> > This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for mikeb
> 
> mikeb or salimma?

salimma. Sorry for copy-paste.

> Note that salimma has recently added me as a co-maintainer of
> python-hypothesis. Should I prioritize bz1714619?

Would be appreciated. Or add me as co-maintainer and I can handle it.
Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2019-07-29 08:44:21 UTC 
Added you and the SIG.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.