Hide Forgot
dracut-modules-olpc depends on bitfrost, but that was just retired: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bitfrost/c/5e291599233eb6885bcb7b3c4c5efb37efd235b0?branch=master so now dracut-modules-olpc is not installable. This is an automatic F31 Beta release blocker, as dracut-modules-olpc is on the Server DVD, so this breaks "Unresolved dependencies on a release-blocking DVD-style (offline installer) image (failures of QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure)" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers
Why is dracut-modules-olpc on the server DVD?
It's not listed in comps and "dnf repoquery --whatrequires dracut-modules-olpc" returns nothing. Both as I would have expected. I don't see anything of note in kickstarts. Is anaconda doing something like dracut* as part of it's includes?
I am honestly not at all sure. This isn't the install environment, it's the packages included on the Server DVD for installation. I can't find a comps entry or dependency that would cause this either, but it definitely *is* there, you can see it in the Server tree too: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190729.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/os/Packages/d/dracut-modules-olpc-0.7.6-13.fc29.x86_64.rpm
Oh, think I found it... https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/fedora.conf#_130
pungi docs say: **additional_packages** (*list*) -- additional packages to be included in a variant and architecture; format: ``[(variant_uid_regex, {arch|*: [package_globs]})]`` The packages specified here are matched against RPM names, not any other provides in the package not the name of source package. Shell globbing is used, so wildcards are possible. The package can be specified as name only or ``name.arch``.
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #4) > Oh, think I found it... > > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/fedora.conf#_130 Yea, that's wrong, it would pull in all sorts of things: dracut.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 @fedora dracut-config-rescue.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 @fedora dracut-network.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 @fedora dracut-squash.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 @fedora dracut-caps.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 fedora dracut-config-generic.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 fedora dracut-kiwi-lib.noarch 9.18.9-1.fc30 updates dracut-kiwi-live.noarch 9.18.9-1.fc30 updates dracut-kiwi-oem-dump.noarch 9.18.9-1.fc30 updates dracut-kiwi-oem-repart.noarch 9.18.9-1.fc30 updates dracut-kiwi-overlay.noarch 9.18.9-1.fc30 updates dracut-live.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 fedora dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.7.6-13.fc29 fedora dracut-tools.x86_64 049-26.git20181204.fc30 fedora EG we probably don't want kiwi either
yeah, all those things do seem to be in the Server tree. The wildcard has been in the tree since the beginning, it seems, though it was originally incorrect and fixed by lsedlar in 2016.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31.