Bug 173550 - Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin
Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Luya Tshimbalanga
David Lawrence
http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-11-17 20:48 EST by Christoph Wickert
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-26 09:04:17 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Christoph Wickert 2005-11-17 20:48:03 EST
Spec Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-netload-plugin.spec
SRPM Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-2.fc4.src.rpm
Description: 
A network-load monitor plugin for the Xfce panel.

Comments:
rpmlint is clean
License GPL and included
Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2005-12-01 08:26:53 EST
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs.
- Fix %defattr.

New SRPM:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-3.fc4.src.rpm
Comment 2 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-06 16:48:09 EST
Passed test. Succesfully built via mock. Ready to be rolled on Extras.
Comment 3 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-22 18:13:42 EST
More detailed review:
+ mock succesfully build the package without noticeable error
+ rpmlint did not report any error nor warning
+ tarball from SRPM matched source tarball for URL listed on SPEC file through
md5 and sha1
+ binary package installed and removed without noticeable issue
+ name of the package/SPEC files follow PackagingGuide and PackageNameGuideline
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines
+ License listed on SPEC file matched the license in the tarball and it is GPL

Accordingly, the package is ready to be included on Fedora Extras.
Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-01-26 09:04:17 EST
Build on all targets succeeded.

CLOSED.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.