Bug 173633 - cman/sm nodeid lookup fails
Summary: cman/sm nodeid lookup fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Retired
Component: cman
Version: 4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Teigland
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-18 19:14 UTC by Scott Cannata
Modified: 2009-04-16 20:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-04 16:52:31 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
ascii file output from kdb, see above description (130.93 KB, text/plain)
2005-11-18 19:14 UTC, Scott Cannata
no flags Details

Description Scott Cannata 2005-11-18 19:14:07 UTC
Description of problem:

System running 2.6.9-22 kernel sitting idle went into kdb with
Assertion failed on line 52 of file cluster/cman/sm_misc.c

Attached typescript file has kdb: bt, sr -t, ps, dmesg output.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

kernel = 2.6.9-22
cman-1.0.2-0
cman-devel-1.0.2-0






How reproducible:

Not sure. We've only seen it once to date and the system
was not doing anything. Testers came in and found it kdb.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Scott Cannata 2005-11-18 19:14:09 UTC
Created attachment 121241 [details]
ascii file output from kdb, see above description

Comment 2 David Teigland 2005-11-22 18:43:22 UTC
Could you verify that cluster.conf was the same on all nodes?,
and a copy of that may be helpful to see, along with
'cman_tool nodes' from one of the other nodes if they are
still running.

This assertion failure may indicate some sort of internal
consistency problem within cman: the sm portion is looking
up a nodeid that the cnxman portion doesn't know about, which
shouldn't be possible.  If the assignment of nodeid's to nodes
was changing while the cluster was running (different versions
of cluster.conf on the nodes possibly), that might lead to this
kind of error.  If untypically large nodeids are being used, that
may point toward the cnxman code that dynamically increases the
standard node arrays.

This assertion failure was reported once before to me in an
email (in May by Dan Phung) and he had been updating cluster.conf
on some nodes.

I'm adding a printk to the code to provide a little more
information in the assertion message if this happens again.


Comment 3 David Teigland 2006-01-04 16:19:02 UTC
waiting for someone to see this again and report with the
additional info from the panic


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.