Bug 173661 - Review Request: xfce4-fsguard-plugin
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-fsguard-plugin
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Luya Tshimbalanga
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-18 20:33 UTC by Christoph Wickert
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-26 14:01:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christoph Wickert 2005-11-18 20:33:05 UTC
Spec Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-fsguard-plugin.spec
SRPM Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-fsguard-plugin-0.2.1-1.fc4.src.rpm
Description: 
A little Xfce plugin, which checks the free space on the chosen mountpoint frequently. It displays 4 different icons and a message box, depending on the free space. The amount of free disk space is visible in a tooltip. If you left-click on its icon, it opens the mountpoint directory in the file manager.

Comments:
rpmlint clean
license BSD and included

Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2005-12-01 02:39:31 UTC
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs.
- Fix %defattr.

New SRPM:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-fsguard-plugin-0.2.1-2.fc4.src.rpm

Comment 2 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-06 22:37:07 UTC
Spec is good. Mock succesfully built from SRPMS, rpmlint passed. Set to FE-ACCEPT.
Congragulation.

Comment 3 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-22 23:17:41 UTC
More detailed review:
+ mock succesfully build the package without noticeable error
+ rpmlint did not report any error nor warning
+ tarball from SRPM matched source tarball for URL listed on SPEC file through
md5 and sha1
+ binary package installed and removed without noticeable issue
+ name of the package/SPEC files follow PackagingGuide and PackageNameGuideline
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines
+ License listed on SPEC file matched the license in the tarball and it is
GPL-compatible http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses

Accordingly, the package is ready to be included on Fedora Extras.

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-01-26 14:01:40 UTC
Build on all targets succeeded.

CLOSED.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.