Bug 1739784 - Review Request: python-pysimplesoap - SOAP library for client and server webservices interfaces in python
Summary: Review Request: python-pysimplesoap - SOAP library for client and server webs...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-08-10 12:39 UTC by Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala
Modified: 2020-03-15 03:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-15 03:50:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
panemade: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2019-08-10 12:39:20 UTC
Spec URL: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-SimpleSOAP.spec
SRPM URL: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-SimpleSOAP-1.16.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Python simple and lightweight SOAP library for client and server webservices interfaces, aimed to be as small
and easy as possible, supporting most common functionality.
Fedora Account System huzaifas

Comment 1 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2019-08-11 17:45:19 UTC
New spec/srpm to mitigate rpmlint warnings:

SPEC: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-SimpleSOAP.spec
SRPM: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-SimpleSOAP-1.16.2-2.fc30.src.rpm

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2019-08-14 16:39:01 UTC
1) License tag need to be "LGPLv3+". Whenever license text says "or (at your option) any later version" use "+".

2) Package name should be python-pysimplesoap because we need to use the name that we import library. Here we will be using "import pysimplesoap" so package name is python-<modulename> that is python-pysimplesoap.

3) License text is not present and I can see upstream also have tests. 
   In this case I generally recommends to use upstream tarball as a source URL but upstream has not released a new tarball so you can ask upstream to do so
OR
Source1: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pysimplesoap/pysimplesoap/master/license.txt

upload this file with upstream tarball
and add in %prep
cp -p %{SOURCE1} .
then in %files section
%doc license.txt

4) Instead of what has been packaged in above SRPM, change it to
%prep
%autosetup -n %{pypi_name}-%{version}
for lib in pysimplesoap/*.py; do
 sed -e '1{\@^#! /usr/bin/env python@d}' -e '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' \
     -e '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/python@d}' $lib > $lib.new &&
 touch -r $lib $lib.new &&
 mv $lib.new $lib
done

%build
%py3_build

%install
%py3_install

Update the spec and submit new update for further review.

Comment 3 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2019-08-16 06:03:39 UTC
Add changed have been incorporated.

SPEC: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-pysimplesoap.spec
SRPM: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-pysimplesoap.spec

Also:

[huzaifas@babylon SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/huzaifas/NotBackedUp/rpm/RPMS/noarch/python3-pysimplesoap-1.16.2-3.fc30.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 4 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2019-08-16 06:15:23 UTC
New SPEC: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-pysimplesoap.spec
New SPRM: https://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/python-pysimplesoap-1.16.2-3.fc30.src.rpm

Again:

[huzaifas@babylon SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/huzaifas/NotBackedUp/rpm/RPMS/noarch/python3-pysimplesoap-1.16.2-3.fc30.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 5 Parag AN(पराग) 2019-08-16 06:41:33 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file license.txt is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text


==> Sorry, I missed to suggest to use %license tag. So fix this by changing line
%doc license.txt
to
%license license.txt

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General
     Public License (v3 or later)", "Python Software Foundation License
     version 2". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/test/1739784-python-
     pysimplesoap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-pysimplesoap-1.16.2-3.fc31.noarch.rpm
          python-pysimplesoap-1.16.2-3.fc31.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
python3-pysimplesoap.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/pysimplesoap/pysimplesoap <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pysimplesoap/pysimplesoap/master/license.txt :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7356e6cda1d7f2e62663e6749aeeb1a1b8e33553f96d6517bad7904bc3423e5a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7356e6cda1d7f2e62663e6749aeeb1a1b8e33553f96d6517bad7904bc3423e5a
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/P/PySimpleSOAP/PySimpleSOAP-1.16.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : b1bbf4d0d0adff9b652197d61aa1b76731ad618849e27d28fe5cb250916d67e1
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b1bbf4d0d0adff9b652197d61aa1b76731ad618849e27d28fe5cb250916d67e1


Requires
--------
python3-pysimplesoap (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python3-pysimplesoap:
    python-PySimpleSOAP
    python3-pysimplesoap
    python3.7dist(pysimplesoap)
    python3dist(pysimplesoap)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1739784 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Python, Generic
Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, R, Perl, PHP, C/C++, Ocaml, Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


So, don't forget to change %doc to %license and then import this package in Fedora.

APPROVED

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-08-16 13:29:42 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pysimplesoap

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2020-03-15 03:50:52 UTC
Closing this package review bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.