Bug 1744144 - Review Request: golang-github-gobuffalo-packr - Simple and easy way to embed static files into Go binaries
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gobuffalo-packr - Simple and easy way to embed ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elliott Sales de Andrade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: golang-github-gobuffalo-logger golang-github-gobuffalo-packd
Blocks: 1744287
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-08-21 12:49 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2019-11-07 02:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-26 00:01:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
quantum.analyst: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-08-21 12:49:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr.spec
SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-2.5.2-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
 Packr is a simple solution for bundling static assets inside of Go binaries. Most importantly it does it in a way that is friendly to developers while they are developing.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-08-21 12:50:35 UTC
COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/1011605

Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-09-05 05:16:22 UTC
Latest version is 2.6.0.

One file appears to be ASL 2.0, which may have been an accident and you might
want to report that upstream.

This is actually a correctly implemented v2 with it contained in a separate
subdirectory. This means your -devel package actually provides both v1 (no
suffix) and v2 import paths, and go.mods, etc.. I'm not sure if that means they
should be placed into their own separate subpackages. It shold provide two
golang-ipath, I think.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat
     License", "Apache License (v2.0)". 163 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in
     1744144-golang-github-gobuffalo-packr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 16 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-2.5.2-1.fc32.src.rpm
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr.src: W: no-%build-section
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr.src: E: specfile-error warning: -u use in %forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm variables!
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel/example/bar/bar.html
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel/example/bar/sub/sub.html
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel/example/baz/baz.html
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel/example/constant/constant.html
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel/example/variable/variable.html
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gobuffalo/packr/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings.


Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/gobuffalo/packr/archive/v2.5.2/packr-2.5.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : f638340c1bb4f671ab5a101969a2e63fe11300cf9ead0f481a8c3e0ab966a423
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f638340c1bb4f671ab5a101969a2e63fe11300cf9ead0f481a8c3e0ab966a423


Requires
--------
go-filesystem
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/envy)
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/logger)
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packd)
golang(github.com/karrick/godirwalk)
golang(github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal/modfile)
golang(github.com/sirupsen/logrus)
golang(github.com/spf13/cobra)
golang(golang.org/x/sync/errgroup)
golang(golang.org/x/tools/go/ast/astutil)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1


Provides
--------
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/builder) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/packr/cmd) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/file) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/file/resolver) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/file/resolver/encoding/hex) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/internal/takeon/github.com/markbates/errx) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/internal/takeon/github.com/markbates/oncer) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/internal/takeon/github.com/markbates/safe) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/jam) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/jam/parser) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/jam/store) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/packr2/cmd) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/packr2/cmd/fix) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang(github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2/plog) = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-devel = 2.5.2-1.fc32
golang-ipath(github.com/gobuffalo/packr) = 2.5.2-1.fc32


Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1744144 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -L packr/
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: fonts, SugarActivity, Java, R, PHP, Haskell, C/C++, Ocaml, Python, Perl
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Built with local dependencies:
    packr/golang-github-gobuffalo-logger-devel-1.0.1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
    packr/golang-github-gobuffalo-packd-devel-0.3.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm

Comment 4 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-11 16:52:15 UTC
Splitted the package in 2 with:

%global goipaths0       github.com/gobuffalo/packr
%global goipathsex0     github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2
%global goipaths1       github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2

And asked upstream about the license: https://github.com/gobuffalo/packr/issues/239

Comment 5 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-11 17:56:30 UTC
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
> Splitted the package in 2 with:
> 
> %global goipaths0       github.com/gobuffalo/packr
> %global goipathsex0     github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2
> %global goipaths1       github.com/gobuffalo/packr/v2
> 
> And asked upstream about the license:
> https://github.com/gobuffalo/packr/issues/239

ASL 2.0 confirmed as error: https://github.com/gobuffalo/packr/issues/239#issuecomment-530470138

Comment 6 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-09-12 02:24:33 UTC
Please import your other reviews; the scratch builds for the other approved packages have been garbage collected.

Comment 7 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-17 00:38:36 UTC
Most packages have been imported.

Comment 8 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-09-17 09:24:34 UTC
Looks good now.

Comment 9 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-09-17 19:16:15 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gobuffalo-packr

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2019-09-17 19:37:59 UTC
FEDORA-2019-8154a87b30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8154a87b30

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2019-09-18 02:00:44 UTC
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-2.6.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8154a87b30

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2019-09-26 00:01:59 UTC
golang-github-gobuffalo-packr-2.6.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.