In 4.3.5 we shipped ioprocess to RHV-M channel, we need it in RHV Host channel.
I do see ioprocess-1.1.2-1.el7ev.x86_64 on rhv-release-4.3.6-6 hosts. Is this enough to verify this bug? Also please move to ON_QA if this is indeed merged to 4.3.6-6.
(In reply to Avihai from comment #1) > I do see ioprocess-1.1.2-1.el7ev.x86_64 on rhv-release-4.3.6-6 hosts. > > Is this enough to verify this bug? > > Also please move to ON_QA if this is indeed merged to 4.3.6-6. This bug is created for the errata
(In reply to Eyal Shenitzky from comment #2) > (In reply to Avihai from comment #1) > > I do see ioprocess-1.1.2-1.el7ev.x86_64 on rhv-release-4.3.6-6 hosts. > > > > Is this enough to verify this bug? > > > > Also please move to ON_QA if this is indeed merged to 4.3.6-6. > > This bug is created for the errata Meaning what? How can I verify this bug? I do see ioprocess-1.1.2-1.el7ev.x86_64 on rhv-release-4.3.6-6 hosts. Is this enough to verify this bug? Why is this bug in MODIFIED ? Please move to ON_QA if this is indeed merged to 4.3.6-6.
It means that you should ignore this bug, this is for errata porpuses only.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3028