From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Description of problem: Currently, RHEL 4.0 only supports a maximum of eight logical processors for the 64-bit x86_64 (AMD64/EM64T) architecture. (On the 32-bit x86 architecture, 32 logical processors are supported.) These limits are outlined on the following Red Hat page: http://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/rhel/details/limits/ With the release of new multi-core processors from Intel and AMD, and new hardware from vendors supporting large numbers of processor cores, this limit is quickly becoming problematic. For example, a multi-processor system containing 4 Intel dual core processors (e.g., Paxville) with hyperthreading enabled will show up as 16 logical processors under Linux. On x86, this works fine, but on x86_64, only 8 logical processors show up, and hyperthreading is effectively disabled. Worse yet, on a multi-processor system containing 8 AMD dual core processors you effectively lose access to half the cores in the system under x86_64. Intel and systems vendors assure me that Red Hat is aware of this problem and that fixes are being planned, but I've been unable to locate a bugzilla bug which is tracking this need. Thus, I'm opening this bug. If there is some internal/hidden bug to track this development, please feel free to dupe the bug. (Note that this bug is similar/related to but NOT a duplicate of Bug 147823.) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install RHEL 4.0 x86_64 on a system with more than eight logical processors. 2. cat /proc/cpuinfo Actual Results: Only eight logical processors will be listed. Expected Results: All available logical processors should be listed. Additional info:
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 163641 ***
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0132.html