Bug 174792 - antlr/CharScanner.java:103: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3987
Summary: antlr/CharScanner.java:103: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gim...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc4
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 173278 175299
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-12-02 07:16 UTC by Andrew Cagney
Modified: 2012-06-20 16:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 16:08:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Trivial backport of the patch that fixed the bug in mainline (2.88 KB, patch)
2005-12-02 19:30 UTC, Alexandre Oliva
no flags Details | Diff

Description Andrew Cagney 2005-12-02 07:16:59 UTC
Description of problem:

antlr/CharScanner.java: In class 'antlr.CharScanner':
antlr/CharScanner.java: In method 'antlr.CharScanner.consumeUntil(int)':
antlr/CharScanner.java:103: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:3987

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. download junit
2. use gcj/fastjar to build junit.jar
3. attempt gcj -c junit.car

need to reduce down to testcase, sigh

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2005-12-02 10:12:38 UTC
Step 1 is fuzzy, lacks info where to download it from...

Comment 2 Alexandre Oliva 2005-12-02 19:30:55 UTC
Created attachment 121775 [details]
Trivial backport of the patch that fixed the bug in mainline

This patch fixes the bug by preventing labels from multiple methods to have the
same identifier, which ultimately caused them to map to the same label
declaration, such that for all but one of the methods with a label at the same
pc, the assertion check failed.

Comment 7 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 16:08:22 UTC
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.