Bug 1749052 - Selecting the replication tab on our CF Global appliances results in an 502 proxy error
Summary: Selecting the replication tab on our CF Global appliances results in an 502 p...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Appliance
Version: 5.10.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.10.10
Assignee: Yuri Rudman
QA Contact: Ievgen Zapolskyi
Red Hat CloudForms Documentation
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1741240
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-04 18:46 UTC by Satoe Imaishi
Modified: 2019-11-12 03:50 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.10.10.0
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1741240
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-23 19:43:07 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2019:2813 0 None None None 2019-09-23 19:43:15 UTC

Comment 3 CFME Bot 2019-09-05 16:11:05 UTC
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/hammer:

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/f964e0b72c88c44144382b4b66b0883d1093fdc7
commit f964e0b72c88c44144382b4b66b0883d1093fdc7
Author:     Yuri Rudman <yrudman>
AuthorDate: Wed Sep  4 09:12:07 2019 -0400
Commit:     Yuri Rudman <yrudman>
CommitDate: Wed Sep  4 09:12:07 2019 -0400

    do not attempt to calculate backlog unless subscription in replicating state
    Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749052

 app/models/pglogical_subscription.rb | 14 +-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comment 4 Mike Shriver 2019-09-12 15:17:26 UTC
Tested in CFME 5.10.10.0.20190905201238_76e3ac6

I setup two replicating appliances, and the Replication tab loaded without issue.

I then took down the 'Remote' appliance in the replication pair, and the Replication tab continued to load without issue (though maybe a little slower).

The replication status was reported as 'down' when the remote appliance was unreachable, instead of triggering a 502 on the page as described in the original BZ.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-09-23 19:43:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2813

Comment 7 Sudhir Mallamprabhakara 2019-11-12 03:50:18 UTC
Changing the test coverage to + as we have the test coverage covered in the original BZ 1741240


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.