Bug 1750159 - Review Request: ibm-plex-fonts - IBM's Plex fonts
Summary: Review Request: ibm-plex-fonts - IBM's Plex fonts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-08 19:06 UTC by Michael Kuhn
Modified: 2020-01-09 20:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-02 00:47:12 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Kuhn 2019-09-08 19:06:48 UTC
Spec URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/ibm-plex/ibm-plex-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/ibm-plex/ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Plex is an open-source project (OFL) and free to download and use. The Plex family comes in a Sans, Serif, Mono and Sans Condensed, all with roman and true italics. The fonts have been designed to work well in user interface (UI) environments as well as other mediums.
Fedora Account System Username: suraia

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-19 15:09:53 UTC
 - Add Version-Release info to your %changelog entry:

* Sun Sep 08 2019 Michael Kuhn <suraia> - 2.0.0-1


Package approved., please fix the aforementioned issue before import.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "SIL Open Font License (v1.1)". Detailed output of licensecheck
     in /home/bob/packaging/review/ibm-plex-fonts/review-ibm-plex-
     fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
     Note: Could not download Source0:
     https://github.com/IBM/plex/releases/download/v2.0.0/OpenType.zip##/ibm-
     plex-fonts-2.0.0.zip
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/SourceURL/
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ibm-plex-fonts-common-2.0.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
          ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
ibm-plex-fonts-common.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
ibm-plex-fonts-common.noarch: W: no-documentation
ibm-plex-fonts.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-09-22 18:06:56 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ibm-plex-fonts

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2019-09-23 18:29:50 UTC
FEDORA-2019-a77a997301 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a77a997301

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2019-09-23 18:36:51 UTC
FEDORA-2019-1851ce5a1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1851ce5a1c

Comment 5 Michael Kuhn 2019-09-23 18:38:35 UTC
Thanks for the review! The package has been built and updates have been submitted.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2019-09-24 00:49:58 UTC
ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1851ce5a1c

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-09-24 01:24:25 UTC
ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a77a997301

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-10-02 00:47:12 UTC
ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-10-02 01:59:46 UTC
ibm-plex-fonts-2.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Nicolas Mailhot 2020-01-09 20:11:02 UTC
Hi,

Thanks for looking at Plex!

Note that Condensed is a style face and should not be split in a separate package as per current Fedora packaging guidelines. That will be made cleared in the guidelines updates FPC is reviewing now.

A guidelines-compliant Plex packageset is available here
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/

and can be used as update as soon as FPC finishes reviewing the new guidelines

(this package actually antedates the one approved here — getting the packaging and guidelines and fontconfig rules right took quite a long time)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.