Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1751964

Summary: [rhel78] Conflicting message appears everytime you set a custom system purpose list attribute even though the value get set on the system
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Rehana <redakkan>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: candlepin-bugs
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat subscription-manager QE Team <rhsm-qe>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.8CC: csnyder
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-16 18:17:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rehana 2019-09-13 09:53:33 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# subscription-manager version
server type: Red Hat Subscription Management
subscription management server: 2.7.5-1
subscription management rules: 5.37
subscription-manager: 1.24.17-1.el7


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Register system 

2.[root@kvm-07-guest37 ~]# syspurpose add FourthList "ThirdItem"
Added ThirdItem to FourthList.
Due to a conflicting change made at the server the FourthList has not been set.
If you'd like to overwrite the server side change please run: syspurpose add-FourthList ThirdItem

3.check system purpose '
[root@kvm-07-guest37 ~]# syspurpose show
{
  "FourthList": [  ----> Notice Fourthlist is added already
    "ThirdItem"
  ], 
  "NewList": [
    "ListItem"
  ], 
  "NewList1": [
    "ListItem"
  ], 
  "SecondList": [
    "SecondItem"
  ], 
  "ThirdList": [
    "ThirdItem"
  ], 
  "addons": [
    "High Availability", 
    "Resilient storage"
  ]
}
[root@kvm-07-guest37 ~]# syspurpose add FivethList "ThirdItem"
Added ThirdItem to FivethList.
Due to a conflicting change made at the server the FivethList has not been set.
If you'd like to overwrite the server side change please run: syspurpose add-FivethList ThirdItem
[root@kvm-07-guest37 ~]# syspurpose show
{
  "FivethList": [
    "ThirdItem"
  ], 
  "FourthList": [
    "ThirdItem"
  ], 
  "NewList": [
    "ListItem"
  ], 
  "NewList1": [
    "ListItem"
  ], 
  "SecondList": [
    "SecondItem"
  ], 
  "ThirdList": [
    "ThirdItem"
  ], 
  "addons": [
    "High Availability", 
    "Resilient storage"
  ]
}


Actual results:
conflicting message appears 

Expected results:
No conflicting message 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Snyder 2019-09-16 18:17:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1740314 ***